Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2007/2/

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Cyrius

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cyrius (talk | contribs) at 21:43, 14 September 2007 (I think it would be best if I declined such an award at this time - acceptance could be seen as provocative). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:43, 14 September 2007 by Cyrius (talk | contribs) (I think it would be best if I declined such an award at this time - acceptance could be seen as provocative)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archives:

Photon belt

I undid your revisions on this article. As far fetched as this claim is, it's still the claim that is proclaimed by some of the proponents of the photon belt belief. Taemyr 20:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Even USGS messed up

Understood, I was just following USGS initial reports, reporting a 7.7 and 7.5. T Rex | talk 02:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't help that its breaking news on a few channels either. T Rex | talk 02:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Sparrowman980

He seems to be trying to follow the Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you non-policy. -- Cyrius|✎ 12:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. He started off on Misplaced Pages with persistent copyright violations, moved on to incivility, then engaged in a bit of revert warring and templating the regulars. Now he's moved on to further edit warring and unleashed a few personal attacks. But I'm a nice guy. :) -- RG 16:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Post-WWII Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe

It's enough to protect the page from moves, I agree. And honestly I don't think we even need a move protection; it is evident the only disputed move is the one done by Ghirlandajo - all others were a response to his controversial and undiscussed action (WP:POINT, anyone?).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  21:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. Should we leave some message for him about this not being the most constructive editing action?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)