Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Suva (talk | contribs) at 12:59, 18 September 2007 (→Moderated nuclear explosion: Factuality.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Moderated nuclear explosion

Moderated nuclear explosion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Possibly hoax, or WP:OR as discussed on Talk. 0 google hits, and using suspicious terms. Владимир И. Сува Чего? 08:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Bad faith nomination. Part of a pattern of stalking and disruptive editing now discussed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren. -- Petri Krohn 09:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Assume good faith. Your talk page happens to be in my watchlist, for whatever reasons (possibly because I had option "Add pages I edit to my watchlist" on for some time). I just happened to notice the conversation and followed the article talk page. The anonymous user who added speedy deletion template was obviously not skilled enought to start AFD procedude, so I decided to help him/her out. Владимир И. Сува Чего? 10:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete 0 Google results for the term "Moderated nuclear explosion" (well, actually, now there are 2 -- both come back to Misplaced Pages). Ewlyahoocom 09:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. ffm 12:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Although it may be factual, how would anyone know to look up this apparently novel term? --Mud4t 12:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Completely unused neologism that has had some serious concerns raised about its validity in its talk that have not been adressed.--Alexia Death the Grey 12:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep though probably "Rename". Stalking. Disruptive behaviour. WP:POINT. User:Suva suddenly finds out Petri has another side, changes his signature so that people will not immediately notice he is the same editor and starts an AFD against one of the opponents and beloved targets of the usual bunch of sockpuppets (surprise, surprise, one of them is here already). There are ways of helping an anonymous contributor, of course, but this way - no way, Jose. I am not an expert, but I did find a number of times the term "moderated nuclear fission", which also sounds new to me, so perhaps this is a terminological problem. --Pan Gerwazy 12:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: I checked with my friend who teaches nuclear physics in university and he says the factuality of this article seems to be incorrect as well. Chernobyl_disaster is unrelated to the topic. And although the concept has some basis, the information is seriously misinterpreted in this article. Владимир И. Сува Чего? 12:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Science and technology)
• AfD debates