Misplaced Pages

Talk:Dansband

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 83.209.100.50 (talk) at 00:30, 24 September 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:30, 24 September 2007 by 83.209.100.50 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconMusic/Music genres task force Stub‑class
WikiProject iconDansband is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Misplaced Pages. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Lame

It doesn't say anything about its sillyness anywhere in the article... :P --83.248.190.175 20:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes the article have a rather biazed positive spin as if Dansband was a good thing when it really is the devil incarnated. :D --ChristianKarlsson.se 14:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
The articles shall follow a "Neutral point of view", not an "Anti-dansband point of view". For some people, dansband music is the ultimate music. / Johan1982 03:21, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
Well, contemporary dance band is nothing like silly, just pointless. Late 70-mid 80 dance band on the other hand.. then we're talking sillyness..
Categories: