This is an old revision of this page, as edited by UninvitedCompany (talk | contribs) at 18:30, 7 October 2003 (move up utopian and hugo & nebula awards). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:30, 7 October 2003 by UninvitedCompany (talk | contribs) (move up utopian and hugo & nebula awards)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The Dispossesed is a utopian science fiction novel by Ursula K. Le Guin, set in the same universe as that of The Left Hand of Darkness (the Ekumen universe). The book won the Hugo and Nebula awards, and achieved a degree of literary recognition unusual for science fiction works.
Warning: Misplaced Pages contains spoilers.
The story takes place in a double planet system similar to the Earth and its moon, except that the moon is massive enough to hold an atmosphere. In the aftermath of a failed anarchist revolution, the rebels were exiled to the moon about two hundred years prior to the events of the story.
The protagonist Shevek is an anarchist physicist/philosopher attempting to develop a theory which will allow the construction of an ansible, a faster-than-light communications device, but his efforts are blocked by parochial and xenophobic attitudes in his home society.
He therefore embarks on the risky journey to the original planet seeking the conversation with other mathematicians and physicists which will bring his theory to fruition. The plot explores his struggles on the anarchist planet, as well as his struggles after he travels to the original planet.
The book also explores the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: on the anarchist planet the use of the possessive case is strongly discouraged. An example is given where a little girl says to Shevek: "you may share in the handkerchief that I use", rather than "you may borrow my handkerchief". The idea is that the handkerchief is not owned by the girl, merely carried by her.
The Dispossessed is considered by some libertarian socialists to be a good description of the mechanisms that would be developed by an anarchist society, but also of the dangers of centralization and bureaucracy that easily take over such society without the continuation of revolutionary ideology.
The work is sometimes said to represent one of the few modern revivals of the utopian genre, though it is notable that one of the major themes of the work is the ambiguity of different notions of utopia.
See also Anarchism in the arts