This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 10:42, 4 November 2007 (Signing comment by 71.236.66.226 - "→Dansband?: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:42, 4 November 2007 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by 71.236.66.226 - "→Dansband?: new section")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Music/Music genres task force Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Lame
It doesn't say anything about its sillyness anywhere in the article... :P --83.248.190.175 20:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes the article have a rather biazed positive spin as if Dansband was a good thing when it really is the devil incarnated. :D --ChristianKarlsson.se 14:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- The articles shall follow a "Neutral point of view", not an "Anti-dansband point of view". For some people, dansband music is the ultimate music. / Johan1982 03:21, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
- Well, contemporary dance band is nothing like silly, just pointless. Late 70-mid 80 dance band on the other hand.. then we're talking sillyness.. 83.209.100.50 00:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Sarnath
- The articles shall follow a "Neutral point of view", not an "Anti-dansband point of view". For some people, dansband music is the ultimate music. / Johan1982 03:21, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
Dansband?
Even if I am Swedish I have to ask, "dansband" however could this be an English term? Well, then we can copy all titles from Swedish Misplaced Pages and just translate the text. I'll add "heltäckningsmatta" next. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.66.226 (talk) 10:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Categories: