This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Father Goose (talk | contribs) at 07:19, 7 November 2007 (feedback). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:19, 7 November 2007 by Father Goose (talk | contribs) (feedback)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)I'm not sure if this is being aimed at being a guideline again, but {{essay}} is all it should strive for. If expert editors don't have any special powers, there doesn't need to be any formal process to recognize them. Furthermore, it is dubious as to whether they should have any special recognition beyond a list of their achievements. If an editor is expert because he or she has three FAs, they should say "I helped promote three FAs" if they want to, and leave it at that.--Father Goose 07:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)