Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Shwartzman Etrogs - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yidisheryid (talk | contribs) at 18:14, 9 November 2007 (Shwartzman Etrogs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:14, 9 November 2007 by Yidisheryid (talk | contribs) (Shwartzman Etrogs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Shwartzman Etrogs

Shwartzman Etrogs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article was set up as a prod a few days ago by User:Shuki out of concern for WP:COI, WP:N. Most of it is certainly self-serving self-advertising violating WP:NOT#ADVERTIZING, but there is a small amount of useful information that should be merged into the main Etrog article. IZAK 07:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


  • Merge (redirect) and combine summarized information into Etrog article. IZAK 07:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. IZAK 07:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete NN company. Information is also WP:OR. The only information that might be able to merge to the etrog article, or perhaps create a legitimate article on its own, is if there is documentation of the existance of this 'ordang' variety, hence the original prod. --Shuki 09:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep even if it is a company it is still a different subject, we can have 2 articles on pepsi and on coke since they are different although they are both cola companies, keep in mind that a shwartsman esrog is not the same as others, and yes to clarify it is the most notable esrog than all other brands.--יודל 11:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable. We have standards here, and the article on this company currently fails those standards. --

Avi 16:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Categories: