Misplaced Pages

User talk:Proabivouac

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Str1977 (talk | contribs) at 19:34, 19 November 2007 (The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:34, 19 November 2007 by Str1977 (talk | contribs) (The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Barnstar

IMHO this is very much deserved.

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your constant efforts in defending Misplaced Pages policy and upholding Misplaced Pages values in spite of severe and unreasonable pressure to desist. •CHILLDOUBT• 12:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Chill doubt! I really appreciate it.Proabivouac 20:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Torah judgement reloaded

You were once involved in the discussion about whether the Banu Qurayza were massacred based/in line with/etc. provisions of the Torah. Some editor has reopened that can and I think you may want to comment ar Talk:Banu_Qurayza#Torah_issue_reloaded. Cheers, Str1977 19:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)