Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nellie Pratt Russell

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Justinm1978 (talk | contribs) at 19:45, 7 December 2007 (→Nellie Pratt Russell: +comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:45, 7 December 2007 by Justinm1978 (talk | contribs) (→Nellie Pratt Russell: +comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Nellie Pratt Russell

Being one of 20 people to sign onto a article of incorporation for a sorority is not notable. This article's sources are only from the sorority, and no solid evidence for notability outside of the sorority is given. Justinm1978 (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Note: I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

Delete not notable Jake the Editor Man _(talk) 19:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep - Let's just delete the sorority too? I have worked very hard on these articles, and you are disrupting the encyclopedia in deleting these? Fuck, let's just delete Alpha Phi Alpha's founders too. I am out of here. This is a waste of my fucking time. Miranda 19:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Surprise, surprise....if Miranda doesn't like someone making a change, then it must be disruptive. The notability of an article or the worth it has to the encyclopedia is not directly correlated to the work that someone put into it. If the articles are worth keeping, then the vote will go that way. If they are not, then they will be deleted. Either way, you do not own these articles. Please be civil, and continue to contribute. Justinm1978 (talk) 19:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

And, that's why I am leaving, because of POV pushers like you who don't write articles and like to disrupt. Miranda 19:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

How exactly am I being a POV pusher? Because I used the process afforded to me to have an article evaluated as to whether or not it belongs in Misplaced Pages? Justinm1978 (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

No, you POV push on articles that people are working on, the whole Title XI "Not a Service Sorority/Fraternity" thing, you haven't added to the encyclopedia, but to distrupt. I want Alpha Kappa Alpha to be a FA, and have created the articles on each of the founders, but you decided to delete all of them, because they are not all notable? THEY ARE FOUNDERS OF AN ORGANIZATION, OF COURSE THEY ARE NOTABLE? Let's see, how about I AFD all of the Eagle Scout founders, and we will call it even. My respect for you is in the negative right now, because your recent edits to me are disruptive. Miranda 19:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome to use the means provided to you in order to advance the encyclopedia, and I won't stop you. You have just as much of a right as me to list things for deletion if you do not believe they are notable, and I encourage you to do so if you feel that way. But wouldn't that be disruptive to prove a point? Just because they were created doesn't mean they belong. We'll see what the community has to say, and I'll be happy to abide by that. Justinm1978 (talk) 19:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Categories: