Misplaced Pages

User talk:MarkThomas

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) at 00:11, 18 December 2007 (Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:MarkThomas/Archive Dec 2007). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:11, 18 December 2007 by Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) (Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:MarkThomas/Archive Dec 2007)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms Template:Userpage otheruse

This is MarkThomas's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

/archive1 = Archived material from 10 May 2006 to 10 November 2006.


"Zionist conspiracy" comment at Talk:Adolf Hitler

I just wanted to let you know that the "Zionist conspiracy" comment at Talk:Adolf Hitler was made by abusive sockpuppet impersonator Ameriquə (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), not by the legitimate user Amerique (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). szyslak (t, c)

Blocked

And unblocked again. I am sorry! That was some time ago & I got my dates wrong. I do apologise! - Alison 01:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/MarkThomas for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete One Night In Hackney303 17:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Probation

Since User:LiberalViews has been blocked by admin User:JzG at This SSP Report as a sockpuppet under your control, the probation that User:LiberalViews was under now applies to you. Per the ArbCom ruling:

Terms of probation

2) Participants placed on probation are limited to one revert per article per week with respect to the set of articles included in the probation. Any participant may be briefly banned for personal attacks or incivility. Reversion of edits by anonymous IPs do not count as a revert. 

   Passed 7-0 at 08:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC) SirFozzie 22:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)