This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zundark (talk | contribs) at 03:58, 25 February 2002. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:58, 25 February 2002 by Zundark (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The Physicist page organizes people by the century they lived in. I find that helpful. Should we do it on our page also? --AxelBoldt
If we do this, then we should do it properly, arranging them by order of birth, rather than mixing alphabetical and chronological order as is done with the physicists. However, I'm not sure this is really better than an ordinary alphabetical listing. Ideally we should have both, but that's probably too difficult to maintain.
Zundark, 2001-08-11
- Maybe at one point we will have a Mathematical timline just like Computing timeline and that would take care of the chronological order. --AxelBoldt
Wouldn't it be advisable to use only one alphabetical list? What's the point of listing living and dead mathematicians separately? What happens if a hitherto living mathematician dies? Maths is supposed to be timeless -- that's one of its greatest charms ;). -- Piotr Gasiorowski
I agree, the division between living and dead is not important. If we give dates of birth and death, then the living ones can be easily identified by not having a death date yet. --AxelBoldt
Is it correct to use characters as Č, Š and Ž herein or should I put them away? I don't know how, for example, Slovene persons are listed in English sources. We don't use trancriptions for names as it is done for Russian names. I can't use swaps as Ch, Sh or Zh.
Best regards.
XJamRastafire
- I would use Č, etc., (as we have been doing for Stone-Čech compactification). Unfortunately, some people won't see them correctly, but they should be OK for most people. The main alternative is just to drop the accents, but I don't like to do that. --Zundark, 2002 Feb 25