This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.167.76.13 (talk) at 02:19, 25 December 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:19, 25 December 2007 by 71.167.76.13 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
Cleaning up government agencies article
I agree that trimming in-universe summary is important, but sourcing does not seem to me to be a useful way to approach the matter, especially as sourcing is, by longstanding convention, not an issue with the sort of material being used here. I think a more productive approach would be to simply remove it per WP:FICT. Phil Sandifer (talk) 04:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pope John Paul II. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --71.167.76.13 (talk) 02:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)