Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ryulong

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Videmus Omnia (talk | contribs) at 23:40, 31 December 2007 (→Your message on a user's talk page: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:40, 31 December 2007 by Videmus Omnia (talk | contribs) (→Your message on a user's talk page: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link.
Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely.
Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page.
I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words.
I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there.
My local time: December 2024 27 Friday 6:44 pm EST
Archives
  1. 2—6/06
  2. 7/06
  3. 8/06
  4. 9/06
  5. 10/06
  6. 11/06
  7. 12/06
  8. 1/07
  9. 2/07
  10. 3/07
  11. 4/07
  12. 5/07
  13. 6/07
  14. 7/07
  15. 8/07
  16. 9/07
  17. 10/07
  18. 11/07
  19. 12/07
  20. 1/08
  21. 2/08
  22. 3/08
  23. 4/08
  24. 5/08
  25. 6/08
  26. 7/08
  27. 8/08
  28. 9/08
  29. 10/08
  30. 11/08
  31. 12/08
  32. 1/09
  33. 2/09
  34. 3/09
  35. 4/09
  36. 5/09
  37. 6/09
  38. 7/09
  39. 8/09
  40. 9/09
  41. 10/09
  42. 11/09
  43. 12/09
  44. 1/10
  45. 2/10
  46. 3/10
  47. 4/10
  48. 5/10
  49. 6/10
  50. 7/10
  51. 8/10
  52. 9/10
  53. 10/10
  54. 11/10
  55. 12/10
  56. 1/11
  57. 2/11
  58. 3/11
  59. 4/11
  60. 5/11
  61. 6/11
  62. 7/11
  63. 8/11
  64. 9/11
  65. 10/11
  66. 11/11
  67. 12/11
  68. 1/12
  69. 2/12
  70. 3/12
  71. 4/12
  72. 5/12
  73. 6/12
  74. 7/12
  75. 8/12
  76. 9/12
  77. 10/12
  78. 11/12
  79. 12/12
  80. 1/13
  81. 2/13
  82. 3/13
  83. 4/13
  84. 5/13
  85. 6/13
  86. 7/13
  87. 8/13
  88. 9/13
  89. 10/13
  90. 11/13
  91. 12/13
  92. 1/14
  93. 2/14
  94. 3/14
  95. 4/14
  96. 5/14
  97. 6/14
  98. 7/14
  99. 8/14
  100. 9/14
  101. 10/14
  102. 11/14
  103. 12/14
  104. 1/15

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng

Vandalism?

That user you just reverted and blocked didn't vandalize my talk page. He/she was trying to find out how to have their original account that they said was blocked vanish from Misplaced Pages.--Urban Rose (talk) 05:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

It was still a sockpuppet of someone who abused multiple accounts in the past.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Who was it a sockpuppet of? Videmus Omnia 05:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Gth629jHelp (talk · contribs) explicitly stated that he was a sockpuppet of Gth629j (talk · contribs) who was blocked some time ago and then created several abusive sockpuppets. I do not understand why we are giving an abusive sockpuppeteer a clean slate here.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

User talk:IrishGuySmart

That blocked user seems to want to talk to you. Regards, Sandstein (talk) 07:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

The user requested the right to vanish. I don't think that's feasible with the amount of sockpuppets he's created, and he seemingly does not realize that he simply stops editting and is done with us.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Pipepaladin

Why did you revert my edits to the First Colonial High School Page? Pipepaladin (talk) 22:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

The group is not notable for discussion, nor can we tell if you are telling the truth.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
so, because you know nothing of the subject, you assume it is not notable for discussion? thats a closed minded approach is it not, all the information was neither slanderous, nor outrageous. It was a simple discussion of the team members, simply their names, as well as a recent event in the team. Pipepaladin (talk) 22:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages has strict policies concerning naming people who may or may not be notable against their wishes, and you do not have a source that supports that they are actually the team members. I will gladly show you how the links to the proper inclusion items.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I'll have to get some sources then
Pipepaladin (talk) 23:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism IP Adress 71.228.207.207

I found an annonymous IP user with IP 71.228.207.207 (contributions • Talk) that has vandalized Misplaced Pages articles, expecially ones related to Power Rangers. Please check if this user has already been blocked. I strongly think he/she does not need to contribute to Misplaced Pages. Mythdon (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I blocked him yesterday.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
If he continues to do vandalism after his block expires, then i will tell you. Mythdon (talk) 06:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


Your message on a user's talk page

Please, please, stop leaving messages like this. You cannot block people for "using Misplaced Pages as a social networking site". The user hasn't done anything disruptive, or in any way impeded the smooth running of the encyclopedia. He has not committed any blockable offences. Gentle encouragement to contribute to the encyclopedia is fine; threatening blocks is only likely to drive a good-faith user away. Walton 12:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia. It is not MySpace. People who treat it like MySpace should be blocked from editting.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
About this MySpace issue, you recently deleted User:This doesnt hurt's userpage. May I ask why? I don't think it said anything offensive... ~ Bella Swan 23:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
The user had very little encyclopedic contributions. User pages are to be used to improve the encyclopedia. Users who do not contribute to the encyclopedia get their user pages deleted, particularly if that is all that they have editted.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC
Ryulong, didn't this issue get raised following your block of the administrator CattleGirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)? I thought you were going to stop this. Videmus Omnia 23:35, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
I did not block anyone. I deleted the userpage of someone who had 4 article edits and several hundred user talk edits. I firmly believe that the activities are improper, but I have given warnings, which was something else you have been harping at me about.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
OK - can you cite the policy behind your deletion? Videmus Omnia 23:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)