Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Molloy (talk | contribs) at 05:45, 6 July 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Previous discussion are archived here:

Talk:Anti-Defamation League/archive1 Talk:Anti-Defamation_League/archive2

Survey on ADL bias

Section 1

I propose that we conduct a vote which shall last 5 days (beginning Wednesday, 6 July 2005 at 05:18:00 UTC. Votes closing 05:18:00 UTC, Monday, July 11, 2005):

1. Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC)

Section 2

The purpose of which is to determine if the ADL is a "biased organisation", and whether or not using texts and studies by the organization as a source in articles dealing with their "declared enemies" (such as David Irving) is un-encyclopedic:

1. Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC)

Section 3

This vote shall not consider anonymous IP addresses, nor registered wikipedians with fewer than 250 edits not directly related to this issue prior to June 6th, 2005:

1. Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC)

Section 4

The two proposals are as follows:

• PROPOSAL #1: The ADL is a "biased organisation"

• PROPOSAL #2: The ADL should not be used as a source, or linked to in articles dealing with their "declared enemies"

Section 5 (Votes)

• In favor of PROPOSAL #1 (votes MUST be signed by valid Misplaced Pages editors):

1. Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC) The ADL is a biased source

• In favor of PROPOSAL #2 (votes MUST be signed by valid Misplaced Pages editors):

1. Concur Molloy 6 July 2005 05:38 (UTC) The ADL should not be used in articles dealing with their declared enemies, it is irresponsible and un-encyclopedic.

Section 6

Comments in favor of neither:

Section 7

Comments in favor of either:

Section 8

Miscellaneous commentary: