This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zer0431 (talk | contribs) at 02:59, 12 January 2008 (→Hurman puppets: Added the message that I pasted to 11EPay's page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:59, 12 January 2008 by Zer0431 (talk | contribs) (→Hurman puppets: Added the message that I pasted to 11EPay's page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Blow of Light's status: In da hood.
Hello. Nothing to rant about today... yes, this is my rant line here. —BoL 05:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- I will respond to messages here for sure. If I feel like rambling, you'll see it on your talk page.
- If you want to attack me, be kind, and I'll be kind. If you want to be a dick anyway, fine, only make one. After that, you'll get these.
- Please post new messages at the bottom. Any messages not posted at the bottom will be disposed of properly.
- Thank you!
- On the IRC Freenode network as —BoL @
- Via e-mail
Welcome
Hello. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I created your account for you.
See our introduction to become acquainted with Misplaced Pages, and move on to the tutorial which, I think, gives some very good information about editing that all Wikipedians should read.
There are lots of ways you can help with the encyclopedia; check out Misplaced Pages:Contributing to Misplaced Pages to find out how.
If you have any questions, you can ask on my talk page, check Misplaced Pages:Questions, or leave {{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will be around to help shortly. Again, welcome, and happy editing! WODUP 06:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you're getting ready to leave a message, right? Remember to sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~), or you shall face the wrath of the omnipotent User:SineBot! Also, every time SineBot has to sign someone else's comment, SineBot will unblock a vandal. He has untold powers even his creator never heard of! Please, for the love of Misplaced Pages, sign your comments!!
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
More advice
I seriously urge you to drop any mention of PeeWee. On ANI, you barged into the thread without knowing anything, did no investigation of the situation whatsoever, and made completely erroneous comments, which not only make you look stupid, but can also inflame the situation and can be construed as disruptive. Let me be frank: a lot of people don't hold a very high opinion of your actions already. Continuing down this path will get you extremely close to the blockhammer. So, perhaps as a New Year's resolution, maybe you should resolve to think twice before posting anything. Happy New Year. —Kurykh 06:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Three times. Avruchtalk 08:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- True. And not only that, I know about that. Happy new year to you too, and can I transfer any accounts I created over? —BoL 01:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean by transfer? As in rename the account to something else? Metros (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- No. This is a sock that I created to write up RFCU drafts on PWeeHurman. I feel that I should transfer the account to someone else in order to prevent any obsession about PWeeHurman, which got me worked up yesterday. Any idea how that can happen? You want it? —BoL 01:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean give it to someone else? Why don't you just scramble the password so you can never log into it again? What good does it do for anyone here at all? Hell, what good does it do for you? Why do you even have it in the first place? You can't report him using your own account? Metros (talk) 01:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- No. This is a sock that I created to write up RFCU drafts on PWeeHurman. I feel that I should transfer the account to someone else in order to prevent any obsession about PWeeHurman, which got me worked up yesterday. Any idea how that can happen? You want it? —BoL 01:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean by transfer? As in rename the account to something else? Metros (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- True. And not only that, I know about that. Happy new year to you too, and can I transfer any accounts I created over? —BoL 01:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Recent nomination for deletion of Soering v. UK
I have noticed that you nominate articles for deletion on a regular basis. You recently nominated Soering v. United Kingdom, which has had quite a response. In the future, if an article is part of a wikiproject, please contact that wikiproject about your proposal, in this case: wikiproject law. Those more knowledgeable in a field can better assist you in determining if an article is notable. Because you left bare commentary on your deletion nomination, I am unable to determine what your criteria was for determining notability. Leaving more commentary assists other users, substantiates the nominator's position, and forces the nominator to investigate the article further. An alternative is to tag a stub for expansion and to notify the appropriate wikiproject. Legis Nuntius (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminding me. By the way, what was the result of the AFD? —BoL 23:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- In fairness to the nominator, this article was not tagged as being part of the project until I added it some 3 or 4 days after the nomination. It also has been expanded dramatically since its original nomination. At that time, it was little more than a stub. Still, your point is a good one - this clearly would fall within the scope of the law project, and it would have saved everyone a bit of trouble if someone familiar with the subject could have weighed in first. Still, since the nominator withdrew (thanks for that by the way) no harm done. Xymmax (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I withdrew. Either way it would have been closed, because it was going on for more than 5 days. —BoL 03:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- In fairness to the nominator, this article was not tagged as being part of the project until I added it some 3 or 4 days after the nomination. It also has been expanded dramatically since its original nomination. At that time, it was little more than a stub. Still, your point is a good one - this clearly would fall within the scope of the law project, and it would have saved everyone a bit of trouble if someone familiar with the subject could have weighed in first. Still, since the nominator withdrew (thanks for that by the way) no harm done. Xymmax (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Userboxes
Thank you for offering, but since I haven't been here for a while, I don't need that anymore. XtraCredit (talk) 18:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
George W. Bush
This wasn't vandalism. It may not have been the most helpful edit in the world, as incumbent is already included elsewhere in the infobox, but it certainly wasn't vandalism. - auburnpilot talk 03:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- I was going to revert my own edit, but thanks. —BoL 03:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Again, this isn't vandalism either. It is a factually accurate addition, and could be sourced with this article from USAToday.com. You really need to be more careful. - auburnpilot talk 01:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Milomolaria
Taunting the vandals doesn't really do anybody any good. :) Corvus cornixtalk 05:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- True. I wanted to do more, but realized I had to stop before I get blocked again. But, that's true, right? —BoL 05:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Seriously here, I spend a lot of time on Misplaced Pages, like 2/3 of my day. I'm just an ordinary editor, like you. I try to help where I can, like you. I write articles, and improve others, when I can. I saw the "shops" thing going on, but had better things to do than get involved. You had some good advice from Kurykh just above. Please, your heart is in the right place, but you need to think a little more before wading in too deep sometimes. As for vandals, they piss us all off, but help is at hand. Just chill a little. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 05:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're right. —BoL 05:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Questions about PWee (sorry if you want to forget about him, I've been busy and need to catch up)
Has he been blocked? Are there any new puppets? What about checkusers? What kind of vandalism is he conducting? Do you see any way to stop him outside of blocking any IP he may use? Please respond on my talk. Thanks, --Gp75motorsports 12:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
RE: RFA
I regretfully decline this offer. I don't really think I'm ready just yet, but I am willing to try, say, in March. I'll contact you when I would like to be nominated. Thanks for the offer, though! Jonathan § 23:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. —BoL 23:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey jack...
...can you create a doppleganger account called User:Jack Merridou? I'll be using that account to create a checkuser log for him and his IPs, so we can have its other IPs blocked. —BoL 23:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- He seems to have gotten there first. I'm all for hobbling this character, but I don't see how my creating a new account will help. email me and he'll not have a chance to snag whatever name gets used. Thanks. --Jack Merridew 06:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have created User:Jack Merridew (doppelganger) and endorsed that it is me from this account. All should be clear enough from the user/talk pages and their histories. What's next? --Jack Merridew 06:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- That's not good enough. You need to think of all the names that can be impersonated and create them, and then tag them with {{doppleganger}}. If you need help, let me know. —BoL 01:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I misunderstood. I don't see it as practical to reserve all possible variations on my username. This would only amount to a challenge to whomever to come up with something I missed. I also don't care to engage in an exercise in self-deprecating naming. I was really more interested in preventing the harassment than the impersonation. --Jack Merridew 09:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
PeeWee
25 January? That's it?! He deserves to be indeffed. I hope whoever blocked him learns their lesson next time. I'd think that such a short block would only fuel his activities. --Gp75motorsports 11:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- IPs cannot be indeffed. The longest anyone can be blocked is between one year to 30 years (yes, accounts have been blocked for 30 years I've heard at AIV.) —BoL 01:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Can you show me? --Gp75motorsports 11:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Potential vandal alert
Hey, BoL I've found another potential troll. He is User:NikhtaSt and he already has three vandalism warnings on his page. That's bad considering he's only been here a little while (the abscence of a userpage signifies a new user). Let's watch this guy. I don't like the way it's looking. (loads M4 Carbine) Here's some ammo. --Gp75motorsports 18:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
(Sorry 'bout that, I copypasted this directly from Alasdair's page.)
Insulted once more
- Hello that racist person may or may not be this one.insults.With no reason sources or any logic i have been extremely insulted in english,in Greek and in albanian(which i dont understand)Megistias (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Not the one. He did have a previous account, but not that one. --Gp75motorsports 23:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Bring that up at ANI. I think FastLizard4 might know russian. —BoL 01:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
lol we're competing again for NPP?
crap... you took my pages... :D hahahahah keep it up man! :D - Jameson L. Tai 02:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, new pages box and Twinkle. Although I didn't tag any, someone else did. —BoL 02:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Marman Twin SD request
DOn't know if you read the link, but that article and the page it referenced are not spam. The Marman is a vintage motorcycle, and the reference page was an enthusiast page on the bike. I posed a hangon tag for the original editor, as I think your request was premature. Cheers. Bagheera (talk) 02:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- The links weren't spam, they were just written in a way that it was blatant advertising. But, yeah, it's poorly unwritten. Cheers, —BoL 03:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
For your welcoming message. AmandaPirato (talk) 03:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. You know, I know someone that can help you fix that sig up. Would you be interested? —BoL 03:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean exactly? I thought using the four tildes was the correct way of doing it? AmandaPirato (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- It is. I mean the design of your sig. —BoL 04:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, go ahead, sounds cool to me ;) I think I can leave those Amanda's out right? AmandaPirato (talk) 04:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. Take this for now: Copy the source code to your preferences:
]]/]
- Yes. Take this for now: Copy the source code to your preferences:
- Alright, go ahead, sounds cool to me ;) I think I can leave those Amanda's out right? AmandaPirato (talk) 04:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- It is. I mean the design of your sig. —BoL 04:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean exactly? I thought using the four tildes was the correct way of doing it? AmandaPirato (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the best I could come up with. Feel free to let me know so I can refer you to another user. —BoL 04:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Uhm, thanks, but for some reason it still looks the same?? Maybe I did something wrong? Amanda/C
- Wow, I messed it up. Amanda/C 04:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey that one looks awesome, I hope it works now. Amanda/C (talk) 04:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wait. —BoL 04:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what to change, I appreciate your kindness and help though :) AmandaPirato (talk) 04:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. He might be able to help. Just show him the sig I made for you and he'll try to fix the problem. —BoL 04:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will leave him a message. By the way, I love SF. AmandaPirato (talk) 05:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I live in SF. —BoL 05:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I saw that on your userpage. I guess I need to create one too some day. I was a few days in SF in 2006 and 2007. AmandaPirato (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm a bit busy right now. Vandals are up. Later. —BoL 05:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will leave him a message. By the way, I love SF. AmandaPirato (talk) 05:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. He might be able to help. Just show him the sig I made for you and he'll try to fix the problem. —BoL 04:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what to change, I appreciate your kindness and help though :) AmandaPirato (talk) 04:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wait. —BoL 04:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey that one looks awesome, I hope it works now. Amanda/C (talk) 04:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, I messed it up. Amanda/C 04:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
East Los Streetscapers
Hey amigo, what's up? I was just kind of wondering what's going on with the article. It looks, from your comments on the talk of the article's creator, like your impression is that the article is self-promotional or intended to spam. May I gently remind you of the guideline to assume good faith? He only has 19 edits, so it's also important to remember not to bite the the newcomers.
What I'm wondering is why you are using "Friendly" to automatically tag the article with {{refimprove}}? Wouldn't that be something you would want to check first, rather than using a bot to haphazardly accuse editors of not adequately citing their sources? Please have another look at the article to determine whether the referencing meets your standards, now that a somewhat experienced editor has had a crack at it. And I would ask you to reconsider your use of this bot, seeing as how it can be taken offensively.
Gracias, --Rockero (talk) 06:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's not a bot, homie. It's a program. And the reason why I use the {{refimprove}} tag because it doesn't seem to be enough with the notability, and i'll try to remember that next time. —BoL 06:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "it doesn't seem to be enough with the notability"? What will you try to remember? I second the editor who asked you to communicate your ideas clearly. I can't tell if you're trying to dissimulate or are just having a hard time expressing yourself. Would you care to elaborate?--Rockero (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Relax, I've removed the tag. It could still be expanded more, I'll do some research on it. —BoL 00:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "it doesn't seem to be enough with the notability"? What will you try to remember? I second the editor who asked you to communicate your ideas clearly. I can't tell if you're trying to dissimulate or are just having a hard time expressing yourself. Would you care to elaborate?--Rockero (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Joe Knox
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Joe Knox. The reason is:
- being the mayor of Mooresville, North Carolina is importance enough
For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC) עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- 'K...thanks...? —BoL 00:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, i'll move this down sorry i accidentally added it to the guy above
I was nowhere near done, that was just my basic which i was going to start editing and inserting references. That is why i was only writing in my talk not in actual Misplaced Pages. So why are you deleting from my talk page? Now i lost all the rough info i had just put in, and its not like the talk page is the actual wikipedia article!? So why'd you delete it? Can you put it back please so i can fix it properly until its a legitimate article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Number631 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I didn't delete it, I just revert it. And please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes Number631 (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC) or I won't respond next time. And not only that, it still looked like spam. Tell you what: I'll revert it, copy it to your userpage, then revert it to before. OK? OK. —BoL 04:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I know it looks like spam, i'm gonna change it i wanna add references to it and everything, i probably won't get to it tonight but i'll make it look like a good article and i'll even ask permission from one of you guys to check it before i try to add it to Misplaced Pages to make sure its good, k?
k. Do you want me to help? —BoL 05:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Thx but i don't need much help now, just a quick question, does a non-english european magazine article rating products count as a valid reference? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Number631 (talk • contribs) 05:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I believe so. —BoL 05:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
k, thx... i'll ask if i have any further questions later on —Preceding unsigned comment added by Number631 (talk • contribs) 05:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for your support | ||
Thank you SO MUCH for your support in my unanimous RFA. Take this cookie as a small token of my appreciation.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Munches cookie* Thanks! —BoL 06:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hurman puppets
This might be of some help.
Confirmed:
(
User talk:(P)(Wii)HermanMcdonalds
1
User talk:11EPayEWayErmanHay11
B
C
H
J
User:JJjonzagain User:JJjonzagain2
J cont.
M
User:Marsjohn123
P
User talk:P oui airmanmcdonald
User:P wee herman peck mcdonalds
User:P wee reubens bot3 [[ User:P wi eeHer mann]]
User talk:P(Ee)W(Ee)H(rm)(A)(N)VIII
User:P(Ee)W(Ee)H(rm)(A)(N)VIII
User talk:P-we(X2)-herrma+n(X 2)
P cont.
User talk:Peeweeklownmcdonalds
User talk:Pope Mcdonald HermanXIX
T
User:The great Bob peck PHMCDnld
Suspected:
1
2
6
B
P
P cont.
Fun stuff! --Gp75motorsports 16:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, fun indeed, but they've all been confirmed by checkuser and all of them have been blocked, as well as their IPs. Their checkuser stats can be found here. It's an account I created to prevent that person from creating it. —BoL 00:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- What we need to do, we need to figure out every possible textual and numerical mutation of the name "PeeWeeHurman" and request that all names be protected. Go here and start posting! --Gp75motorsports 02:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Got it. And possible socks go here. —BoL 02:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Relax, man, chill. I gotcha. --Gp75motorsports 02:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Got it. And possible socks go here. —BoL 02:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- What we need to do, we need to figure out every possible textual and numerical mutation of the name "PeeWeeHurman" and request that all names be protected. Go here and start posting! --Gp75motorsports 02:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh, and uh, could you paste the following message to any other Hurman sock you may just "happen across"?
You got it all wrong, man.
I think the question is, can you handle it ? I don't think you realize that our army is far bigger than yours. It's us, not you, who will come out on top. It's us, not you, who never give up. It's the entire world versus ONE MAN. WE WILL WIN. GIVE UP NOW. Otherwise it's wikihell's gates for you. --Gp75motorsports 02:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
LSE Article
Hi, I was merely trying to re-order and clean up the alumni and notable staff section, which had become clogged down with people adding alumni in random places in the middle of sentences, mnaking no sense, and in one big block of text, which did not make readable viewing. I trust this is ok, surely be reorganising it into categories and into paragraphs, it is better for the reader? With regards to the information itself, only one or two names have been updated for fit the current situation as of January 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.86.148.24 (talk) 02:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC) HOW DO I SIGN THIS, I'M MERELY TRYING TO MAKE A JUSTIFIABLE CHANGE!!!
- Ja, ja, ja. Please sign your entry every time otherwise I will ignore it, etc, etc, it's because you keep editing the thing. Please read WP:OWN and WP:COI before continuing, or I will not respond to any more comments you make. Thank you. —BoL 02:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
That sounds really like the 'please be nice and i'll be nice comments back' that you mention on your talk page - I don't know how to use all this signature, User: WPR crap on wikipedia, merely editing articles, so I'm trying here and would appreciate it if you didn't get all "ja, ja, ja... i'm not going to bother etc." as that isn't achieving anything. Please explain the conflict of intertest here, as I have merely reordered/formatted the section to enable it to be easier read and understood, the article itself remains factual as with many other university/school etc. alumni sections.I believe i have to sign something like this 128.86.148.24 (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- That's how most rules go around here. And to sign, you simply enter 4 tildes, like you did. And not only that, yes, if they do something bad like put them all over the place, you just simply move/revert, and warn. It's easy as 1-2. Click here for a list of user warnings. You know, you should really consider getting an account. And your conflict of interest is you have some interest with the article like cleaning it up and improving it (I'm not saying you're converting it into a spam article), but, yeah, WP:COI has the answers to your problems. If I cannot think of it, I will remove the tag. —BoL 02:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for responding. Yes, I can see your concern, but reading through the article COI I can't see how I am self-promoting the institution, other than that of an alumni section on anything would indirectly provide cause to do so, and am certainly not receiving money, funds etc. or any otherf things that would entice me in such a way. My reasons for the edit, were purely to create a more cohesive article, easier to read, and ordered in such a way as it makes more sense, rather than a list of names in one article where there was no coherance. Thanks, 128.86.148.24 (talk) 02:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Done Now removing tag. —BoL 02:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Cheers, and thanks for helping with the signature/COI framework articles etc. - I am considering an account now! 128.86.148.24 (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Would you like me to create one for you? —BoL 02:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Erm.. yeh how do you go about it? 128.86.148.24 (talk) 02:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)