Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 00:50, 15 January 2008 (Signing comment by Blue Laser - "→RE: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• I will respond to messages here.
• If you have a grievance with me, please remain civil and be kind, and I will respond in kind.
• Please post new messages at the bottom.
• Thank you!

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

Deletion of your talk page

Sorry, but deleting a user talk page isn't housekeeping. I must object and strongly urge you to restore it. Snowolf 22:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Plenty of admins do it, I don't have a problem with it. Best, Keilana 22:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Archive 36

How is it a valid archive? It did not come from the main talk page, and it is gibberish. It makes no sense. So what are your grounds for keeping it? MrKIA11 (talk) 22:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know that, what was it then? That strikes me as a bit odd. Best, Keilana 22:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes it is. That's why I nominated it. It should definitely be deleted. Will you, since your an admin, or should I put the template back? MrKIA11 (talk) 22:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll delete it momentarily. Thanks for notifying me. Best, Keilana 23:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Note about second proposal related to restrictions of Gp75motorsports and Blow of Light

As someone who gave your input into my initial proposal, would I be able to respectfully request your input into a secondary proposal which addresses issues related to the restrictions placed on Blow of Light specifically? Your input into gathering consensus at this discussion would be much appreciated. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 12:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Hew Scott

You are probably right to recommend this formally for deletion - but only formally. It is pretty scanty right now and I hope to add ot it in future. His extensive work is a fairly fundamental tool for historians and genealogists - try Googling him or his work - so, yep, he matches the notability criterion. Thanks for the prompt to more work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony164 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I did pick up some stuff on Google, hence the AFD. Just poke me if you need anything, administrative or otherwise. Best of luck you you! Keilana 23:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.

In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.

By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.

Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.

John Carter (talk) 21:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

RE

What, Ive been warned and I stopped. I havent done anything In the past...5 minutes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue Laser (talk • contribs) 00:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)