This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dhartung (talk | contribs) at 06:01, 22 January 2008 (→Corruption in Angola: comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:01, 22 January 2008 by Dhartung (talk | contribs) (→Corruption in Angola: comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Corruption in Angola
- Corruption in Angola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Blatant POV issues. The first line tells the story: "Corruption in Angola is a pervasive phenomenon, hindering economic growth and government-sponsored liberalization programs." The assertions may be correct (I suspect they are), but this is simply not appropriate. Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, properly referenced instance of an incomplete series. Corruption is widely recognized as a pervasive social problem, especially in Africa, and it is receiving increasingly intense attention, so I'm not sure what your problem with this topic is. --Dhartung | Talk 03:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Because it takes a blatant point of view, not a neutral one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment There's a point of view that corruption is good? I hope that's not what you mean. What do you mean? --Dhartung | Talk 06:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Because it takes a blatant point of view, not a neutral one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to Politics of Angola. Highly POV title. The problem may be pervasive, but the parent article is sorely lacking and this would lead to a better representation.-Wafulz (talk) 03:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The original posting of the prod template is improper at best, vandalism at worst. This AfD is a WP:POINT violation. Jose João (talk) 03:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: How could you possibly call this vandalism and keep a straight face? Misplaced Pages has a long-established policy against articles which promote a particular point of view, and this article goes against that policy. The prod was very much in order, and when it was removed, an AfD was then in order. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- A 24-hour block would be lenient. Jose João (talk) 04:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)