This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Indubitably (talk | contribs) at 01:54, 25 January 2008 (→help: Bah). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:54, 25 January 2008 by Indubitably (talk | contribs) (→help: Bah)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) This page looks best in Mozilla Firefox.
“ | Women who seek to be equal with men lack ambition. | ” |
— Joseph Danek |
User | Awards | BRC | Notebook | Contribs | Subpages |
LaraLove (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
*READ THIS FIRST OR YOUR MESSAGE MAY BE IGNORED*- If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. If I've left you a message, you can reply there or here. If you chose to reply here, I will respond here.
- If you are pissed off at something I've done, assume good faith. Most likely, whatever I did was with the best of intentions. If you decide to pitch a fit on my talk page anyway, note that I endorse WP:DGAF.
- If you're coming to ask me to review something, I may not be able to devote full attention to it as I, too, am working to bring several articles to Good and Featured status.
|
Can it be
someone else's teim to play martyr plz? the_undertow 19:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dude, not everyone posts wikibreak banners or talk page notices regarding time constraints for attention. Sometimes it's a genuine desire to keep people from asking them to do shit they aren't going to do, to avoid having to say no and subsequently feel bad about it. So calm down. <3 Lara❤Love 20:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Um dood. Your lil message forgets to include the other humble editors who may just stop by to work on an article. You need to chill. Now. Srs. the_undertow 00:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Lara❤Love 01:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Um dood. Your lil message forgets to include the other humble editors who may just stop by to work on an article. You need to chill. Now. Srs. the_undertow 00:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm working to bring several articles to Good and Featured status myself. the_undertow 01:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I, too, am working to bring several articles to Good and Featured status. Just for you. Lara❤Love 01:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
This user has rollback rights on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify) |
- Haha... damn. Dude, check it. I looked at tuition, it's more than twice the cost for out-of-state students. Over $11k/semester for UMass Boston! Lara❤Love 19:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's only $4k for me to attend UNC Greensboro. Bah. Lara❤Love 21:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Three things:
- Trebuchet MS > Veranda
- Close yer font tags
- 'at's mine box, k?
- Will 22:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Three things:
- What's Veranda? Regardless, Verdana > All.
- Negative. See #1.
- Good to know who to give credit for the laughs to. The construction is nice, though. Lara❤Love 02:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- A veranda is a porch. Always misspell the font's name. Still, I love Trebbie for some reason. And if you really want to laugh at rollback, that userbox used to have an associated category ;) Will 00:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- So 2 five year-olds are walking through an apartment complex. One looks up and says, "Holy shit. There's a condom on that veranda!" His friend looks at him and says, "What the fuck is a veranda?" the_undertow 00:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Three things:
- Three things:
- It's only $4k for me to attend UNC Greensboro. Bah. Lara❤Love 21:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Request an account
Hi, LaraLove
Please restore move protection sysop only as well :)
-- The Helpful One 20:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Beat me to it! :)
The Helpful One 21:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ya, dude. I know. These are separate steps, each taking a moment in time. I was literally like 2 minutes deep into the 2 and a half minute process. Thanks for the note, tho. Lara❤Love 21:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
COI question
Hey, hi...I know that I am not allowed to contribute to article on myself Dana Ullman, but am I allowed to contribution to the Discussion page and to response to questions raised there? Also, at my Discussion page is an old COI reference, but because the previous article was entirely deleted and a new one was created, I had NO involvement in the present article. As such, is it possible and fair to ask someone (you?) to remove the COI reference? Dana Ullman 01:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- You are most certainly allowed to edit the talk page of your article. Just don't get into any contentious discussion. I'll look over the possibility of removing the banner. Lara❤Love 02:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- You have three edits to your article, the current version. Two from August and one from November. For that reason, the banner must remain. Lara❤Love 02:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- He's allowed to edit the article about himself, IIRC, same restrictions. Elonka's done it with her's. And personally, I think the talk has enough contentious discussion even while the subject was banned. One stubbing of a BLP and the hounds get all over you... sheesh :/ Will 02:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the note, Will. Dana is actually on restricted editing while I mentor him. So it's a different situation. Lara❤Love 02:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's also a question of what is wise, not just what might be allowed. Using the talk page is allowed and avoids raising any suspicions. Editing the article will always raise suspicions.
- This is a touchy one as regards COI. Inserting content to one's own writings and using Misplaced Pages to increase notability is a very slippery slope. Again, the talk page is the safe place to discuss it, but editing the article in such a situation is dynamite. -- Fyslee / talk 04:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Is this posted at AN/I or something? He's on editing restrictions as part of the mentorship deal. He's allowed to edit all talk pages, but not certain articles. Using his own work is allowed as long as it meets WP:RS. I've got it under control. Lara❤Love 04:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, I haven't posted it there. I was just mentioning it to you. Since you are his mentor (and I'm sure you don't want to become an "accessory to the crime"...;-), I'm sure you will give him a royal chewing out so he doesn't get anywhere near such a dangerous matter as a COI issue of promoting or posting his own material. You represent Misplaced Pages, not him (IOW you are not his "defense attorney"), so your duty is to advise him, not to protect him. I'm sure you do have it all under control, so good luck. Love your user page! -- Fyslee / talk 04:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- BTW, the only reason I even knew of his existence is because he was uncivil to me. His comment didn't even make sense, since I didn't do or say what he criticized. It was a rather weird comment, and he was chastised accordingly. I then checked him out and found out he was a banned user with a COI (advocacy is not allowed here) as regards editing anything related to homeopathy, and that you had adopted him. I hope he doesn't take you down with him. That has happened before. Good luck again. -- Fyslee / talk 04:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Where is his mentorship deal located? -- Fyslee / talk 04:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey hi Lara...First, to clarify something about the article on me Dana Ullman, this article was stubbified in December, and all of my minor contributions were deleted. I have not contributed to this article since it was re-created. I'm a clean machine, and it seems that the COi notice has no real meaning any more. As for Fyslee's statement about me being "uncivil"...actually, I didn't criticize him personally at all; I criticized his argument. I believe that people who harp on the smallness of the homeopathic dose are missing the point, and I wrote that it is akin to saying that the atomic bomb was a placebo because of the "smallness" of an atom. It ain't the size; it's the motion that makes the atomic bomb (and the homeopathic medicine)! I was not uncivil. Heck...I even greeted him (and I meant it). Dana Ullman 05:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, Dana. I'll have to look into it for you.
- Fyslee, I'm not really sure what you mean by "royal chewing out". I don't lay smackdowns on my adoptees. I also just stated above that he's allowed to provide self-references in his talk page discussions about content as long as they meet WP:RS. And I realize I'm not his defense attorney, but I also realize that he's not on trial. I have respect for him and I understand his frustrations. It takes time to learn and adapt to WP policy, especially when it comes to COI. It must be a very difficult situation to have an article about you that you can't really contribute to. I also feel it must be extremely difficult to handle the frustration of having every edit you make to the mainspace reverted, usually by the same editors, regardless of the article, which could leave one to assume that some stalk his contributions.
- As far as your diff, considering what he puts up with, I don't find it uncivil. I think he's handling the stresses he's under here pretty well. I don't understand Homeopathy or the related issues, so I stay out of most of the discussions, but I chime in when I feel like either he or another editor needs to be reminded of some things. But I find most of the discussions to be utterly ridiculous. But don't worry about me going down. Like I said, it's under control.
- And the deal is in his inbox. Unless he deleted it. Lara❤Love 05:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Help stopping Harassment from User:One_Night_In_Hackney
Lara, this guy and some friends have taken it upon themselves to harass me all day over various articles, including an article about me, Thomas Lessman. The article was written by someone else, and I corrected some inaccuracies (like what City I'm in). When references were requested, I provided them. This User:One_Night_In_Hackney has mentioned on his talk page and others that he is targeting the article because he is mad at me for reverting some of his unwarranted edits. And he just keeps going. What can be done when another editor is harassing you and making it personal? Thomas Lessman (talk) 04:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Can you provide diffs of these comments he has made regarding you? Lara❤Love 04:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean by "Diffs", but I think I can provide them. Which comments of his are you referring to, he's made quite a few on Talk:Thomas Lessman, the Admin noticeboard and others. If he posted legitimate grievances and gave opportunity to correct or improve, that would be different. But he's not accepting anything presented to satisfy his demands nor is he showing any signs of being willing to compromise. And his attacks keep getting worse. Thomas Lessman (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Stop forum shopping. One Night In Hackney303 04:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Haha, you're accused of harassment and then you follow the guy here. Classic! the_undertow 04:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Thomas, by diffs, I mean links to the edits he's made regarding you "on his talk page and others". Your request has already been rejected at AN/I, which I saw right before you posted to my talk page, but I'll look into the possible personal attacks and/or harassment. Lara❤Love 04:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- You could start with this ("But for this Hackney idiot to call it a "vanity article" is beyond stupid, especially when this guy suddenly gets a hard-on to attack and harass me for no reason") and this ("I really think this Hackney guy just has too much spare time and a grudge against me."). Check my edits to the article, they are all above board. Check the talk page where I explained why the sources weren't acceptable, check them for yourself as they don't source the information in the article. Check the history of the article too, another editor agreed. One Night In Hackney303 04:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- For the record, this has already been dealt with at WP:ANI. I am going to say here what I said there. Ignore each other. Leave each other alone. Don't defend yourself, don't explain yourself, don't do anything. Once either of you stops, this goes away instantly. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, I agree. Considering it's two sided, if you can't both let it go, which ever one keeps it up will be blocked while the other goes on about his merry way. Lara❤Love 04:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- For the record, this has already been dealt with at WP:ANI. I am going to say here what I said there. Ignore each other. Leave each other alone. Don't defend yourself, don't explain yourself, don't do anything. Once either of you stops, this goes away instantly. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
help
Hi, I am under discussion for a community ban. See . All in all my experience on Misplaced Pages hasn't been great and I want out, but want to clear my name first. Can U help? Abridged 01:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm too busy to read a bunch of mess. Cliff's Notes the situation for me. Lara❤Love 01:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)