This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 01:19, 3 February 2008 (Signing comment by 61.209.163.247 - "→It's too bad: "). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:19, 3 February 2008 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by 61.209.163.247 - "→It's too bad: ")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hi Amazonfire! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! миражinred (speak, my child...) 02:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
So far from the bamboo grove
Amazonfire, I hope we can settle the dispute peacefully. I read your source (Russian!), well actually I translated it, and it says exactly the opposite of what you claim. The Russian link says 600 criminals have been detained for crimes. миражinred (speak, my child...) 02:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Whether they were detained or not for their crimes shouldn't matter anyways. It's what South Korean newspapers claim so... миражinred (speak, my child...) 02:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Calling users "authoritarian" or "vandal" is actually an example of Misplaced Pages:Tendentious editing. Content dispute is not vandalism. And the Russian source that you ironically used to support your view actually claims that about 600 Japanese POWs were indeed detained for crimes so your claim is false. миражinred (speak, my child...) 02:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Umm, look. There is a chance that Watkins's father was indeed a war criminal. If you want me to be "philosophical not political," you shouldn't have added that "fact" in at first place. If you want to argue with me, argue at RfC. миражinred (speak, my child...) 02:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk: So Far from the Bamboo Grove миражinred (speak, my child...) 02:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
The very same Russian link you used as a source is contrary to your claim. миражinred (speak, my child...) 02:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to argue with me, argue at its note. You are false. See its note. Amazonfire (talk) 02:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- I already listed your conducts at the talk page. миражinred (speak, my child...) 02:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Kofun period
The above article has now been fully protected due to the edit war in which you have been a participant. Although it is currently protected on the version you have been supporting, you should not view that as a victory or as a license to stop participating in the discussion. If I don't see constructive input from your side of the argument, I will allow the other side to make the changes they deem appropriate. If a solution can't be reached within four days, further steps may need to be taken to resolve the dispute. Kafziel 23:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think some Korean POV don't require proof, such as ==Relation of Yamato court and Korean peninsula== or ==Relation of Yamato court and Korea==, because the nations of Korean penisula were not only Korean but also many nations, such as chinese, mongolian, etc. Amazonfire (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Everything on Misplaced Pages requires proof, because our policy is that everything must be verifiable. No matter how obvious something seems, if someone wants to see evidence then a reliable source has to be provided. If a reliable source can't be found, then it is generally considered original research. In this case, I don't think sources should be hard to find, once everyone puts aside the name calling and edit warring. Kafziel 00:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- I see. Thanks. That is Wiki. OK. I will.Amazonfire (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Everything on Misplaced Pages requires proof, because our policy is that everything must be verifiable. No matter how obvious something seems, if someone wants to see evidence then a reliable source has to be provided. If a reliable source can't be found, then it is generally considered original research. In this case, I don't think sources should be hard to find, once everyone puts aside the name calling and edit warring. Kafziel 00:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome, but...
Hello Amazonfire. How do you do? Welcome to English Misplaced Pages. Well, Although I have checked your contributions, it seems that you are unfamiliar to some conventions of English Misplaced Pages. So I want to give two hints こんにちは、Amazonfireさん。はじめまして。ウィキペディア英語版へようこそ。さて、私はあなたの投稿履歴を少しチェックしたのですけれども、あなたは少し英語版に不慣れであるように見えます。ですから、少しだけヒントを出します:
- Avoid the word "vandal" - In Misplaced Pages, the word "vandal" means "any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages." But contents dispute is not "vandal". Please do not use the word easily. If someone uses it so, s/he is wrong. 安易に荒らしという言葉を使わない - ウィキペディアでは「荒らし」の言葉は『百科事典の品質を低下させるようなあらゆる編集のこと』を言います。ですが、内容論争は「荒らし」ではありません。ですから、そのような言葉は簡単に使ってはいけません。もし、誰かがそのようなことをしていたとしたら、その人が間違っているんです。
- Please keep cool, and do not engage to edit warring - Edit warring is not allowed in any reason. Administrator will blocks the addict of it. Even if someone does such a thing, you must not imitate it. 冷静に。そして編集合戦に参加してはいけません - いかなる理由であっても、編集合戦は許可されません。管理者はその編集者をブロックするでしょう。誰かがそのようなことをしていたとしても、あなたがそれを真似てはいけません。
Misplaced Pages is a project which continues for a long time, in the future. Therefore, let's live easy. ウィキペディアは長く続くプロジェクトです。ですから、のんびりやりましょう。--Nightshadow28 (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I appreciate your presentation. Amazonfire (talk) 13:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
It's too bad
There are billions of web pages out there. If you can't find an adequate, reliable source among them to back your claim, then it's just too bad. I've contacted some administrators for intervention at So Far from the Bamboo Grove. миражinred (speak, my child...) 21:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I only said you not to cover the fact that Japanese prisoners of war in the Soviet Union is not related to the war crime. The Japanese who had become the captive of a Soviet federation was indiscriminately restrained. This fact are easyly conformed by you. Why do you want to cover the facts? It's a shame that you are a hsitrorical revisionist.Amazonfire (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- No one cares about what you want to say. What matters is that your sources resonate with your claim. I've dealt with tendentious editors in the past, but no one but you had the audacity to engage in disruptive editing with a source that contradicts the claim. миражinred (speak, my child...) 21:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- You haven't presented any source that deny that The Japanese who had become the captive of a Soviet federation was indiscriminately restrained. This is well-known piece of information. So any one don't agree with you. You should read the wiki page again. Amazonfire (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I would like to repeat the comments verbatim to you. миражinred (speak, my child...) 22:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I already have a source. And it's the source that you have presented, the direct opposite of your claim. миражinred (speak, my child...) 22:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- You must present a source that deny that The Japanese who had become the captive of a Soviet federation was indiscriminately restrained. I already sourced and we present you in wikipedia page Japanese prisoners of war in the Soviet Union.Amazonfire (talk) 22:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles aren't used as a source and nowhere does the article say that they were "indiscriminately restrained." Stop putting your pro-Japanese spin on the facts. миражinred (speak, my child...) 22:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I only suggested you to see the page and its sources, not to say the page is a source. It's a shame that you are a hsitrorical revisionist.Amazonfire (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
In advance, I offer condolence for your unsuccessful Rfcu attempt to smear appletree and me. Heck, I don't even know if we live in the same country. миражinred (speak, my child...) 22:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Amazonfire, you have gone through these WP:RFCU and WP:SSP file three times, so you, of course feel annoyed at me if you're innocent. However, you fail to make a point in this dispute and filed the false accusation because the two users don't agree with your POV pushing. I'm too convinced that you are either a sock of somebody whom I know or at least a meatpuppet. I gather some info about you. I don't worry about your claim. Because I'm not like you. Cheers!
- Misplaced Pages:Suspected_sock_puppets/Azukimonaka
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amazonfire
--Appletrees (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Amazonfireさん。日本語が通じるようなので、日本語で書きますね。
- 私が「韓国の反日感情」の記事で、Sceenerの記事を差し戻したところ
、 1分後にAppletreesから警告が入ってきました。
おそらくSceenerやSceenerは彼の別働隊でしょう。
(彼の特徴は「バイアス」と「ほとんどの歴史家」です。) この情報が、あなたの役に立てば幸いです。
色々と不愉快なことを経験していると思いますが、良い編集をお願いします。 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.209.163.247 (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)