This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Random user 39849958 (talk | contribs) at 01:15, 6 February 2008 (povfork). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:15, 6 February 2008 by Random user 39849958 (talk | contribs) (povfork)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chiropractic controversy and criticism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1, 2 |
WP:POVFORK
A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines. Let's make sure that this article doesn't become that. -- Levine2112 01:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)