Misplaced Pages

Talk:Chiropractic controversy and criticism

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Valjean (talk | contribs) at 04:39, 6 February 2008 (agree). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:39, 6 February 2008 by Valjean (talk | contribs) (agree)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chiropractic controversy and criticism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2

WP:POVFORK

A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines. Let's make sure that this article doesn't become that. -- Levine2112 01:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Good point. If that happens, I'll support a AfD. I have also removed the homeopathy article probation template because no one is discussing homeopathy here. If that happens, it can be replaced. -- Fyslee / talk 04:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)