This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Beach drifter (talk | contribs) at 21:18, 6 February 2008 (→Incident (Scientology)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:18, 6 February 2008 by Beach drifter (talk | contribs) (→Incident (Scientology))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Incident (Scientology)
- Incident (Scientology) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article consists wholly of primary sources that appear chosen in a POV fashion to cast Scientology in a ridiculous light. The article is POV and original research. There is a list of "References" that appear to be 3rd-party but none of these are linked to the article. This article is analogous to two recently deleted articles that failed to include 3rd-party sources despite their being fundamental concepts of Scientology, i.e. Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/ARC (Scientology) and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/KRC (Scientology). The vast bulk of these "incidents" have no importance in Scientology but how would the reader know whether that is true or not as there are no 3rd-party sources. JustaHulk (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete or scrap and re-write. As you said, a list of vague 'incidents' that I can gather no real information from.