This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 156.34.213.177 (talk) at 00:29, 10 February 2008 (comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:29, 10 February 2008 by 156.34.213.177 (talk) (comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Sorry about that dude
Dream Theater rocks : ) Wisdom89 (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Templates
Stop re-formating templates. Your version is no different than mine other than the fact that it is a different color. Also, your version is not the standard musical artist template either. The difference between your template version and mine is a personal preference. Undeath (talk) 04:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Templates are not black. Only 11 year "metal stereotypes" make them that colour. Look at other Rock templates to see which colours are standard use. Then do Misplaced Pages a favour and go around and change all the templates that aren't the right colour so that they all look the same. Even better.... change them into the newer navbox format that uses the 'field 1', 'field 2' etc structure. Leave the black backgrounds for the amateur fansites and schoolboy book reports. This is an encyclopedia. 156.34.213.177 (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- You obviously do not know the standard format because you are only changing colors around. There is a wikiproject that is changing the format of templates, and you are not changing them to the right format. You are chaning them just to change them. Undeath (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- If you continue to change only the color, I will change them back. They are un-constructive edits. Undeath (talk) 00:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- You obviously do not know the standard format because you are only changing colors around. There is a wikiproject that is changing the format of templates, and you are not changing them to the right format. You are chaning them just to change them. Undeath (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
An encycplopedia is all about consistency. Why should 99% of Rock music navboxes be the same colour and the ones you like match your own unencyclopedic POV? If you keep reverting you will be reported for 3RR. If you revert using the rollback function... which is for vandalism only... you will be reported for misuse and the rollback function will be taken away from you. It's just that simple. You colour scheme matches your username... "heavy metal stereotype" Think encyclopedia... not schoolboy book report. 156.34.213.177 (talk) 00:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Rolling Stones revert
Hey-
I'm new to all this diff'ing & History stuff, but it appears that you reverted my "Rhythm & Blues" edit back to "ryhthm and blues", for WP:ATT, on the Rolling Stones page?
If so, why not add a fact tag, to give me a chance to find a cite, rather than just removing my edit? That's kinda rude...
ACushen (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Vampires (song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Your contribution to has been determined to contain incorrect information. Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor. Please see Misplaced Pages:Verifiability for more information about this. Thank you. --Ixfd64 (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about that; I thought you were inserting false information. Your edit has been reinstated. --Ixfd64 (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note that vandal tools can be used to revert edits that are Legitimate also. Compwhiz II(Contribs) 22:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't believe they should... just a difference of opinion I guess. Back when I was still an "account" I was a VandalProof user as well as popups and Lupins tools etc. I was very diligent that I did not use any vandal tool to revert an edit that caused a link error or went against known consensus or anything else that wasn't clear vandalism. For those rv's a correction with a proper edit summary was more appropriate. I have zero tolerance for vandals and trolls. But I can AGF a spelling mistake and not use something like popups to rv... because I think that's ill use of the tools. It makes not difference to me now. After I rolled over 20000 edits I abandoned my user account for the purity of anonymous editing. Which means that now... I have no tool :D don't tell Wiki alf that I said that... he'll never let me forget it Have a nice day! 156.34.213.177 (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello! I've noticed that you have edited Misplaced Pages without logging in to an account. I'm happy that you've been contributing. However, I urge you to create an account. Here is a list of the benefits of having an account:
- You can create new pages
- You can use watchlists
- You can upload images
- You can keep your account from being unfairly blocked if you share an IP address
- You can use scripts to better fight annoying vandalism
- After four days, you can edit semi-protected pages
- After a while, you might be able to become an administrator
There are no cons to signing up for an account. In fact, there are more pros here! Signing up is completely free and you don't need to enter any personal information! Plus you can have a user page like mine! So, unless you can think of a con, sign up for an account right now! Compwhiz II(Contribs) 00:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |