Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wisdom89 (talk | contribs) at 19:02, 12 February 2008 (→{{la|DZOZ-TV}}: c). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts WP:RFPP WP:RFP WP:RPP Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Skip to table of contents requests to raise protection lower protection requested edits (purge) Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

WrestleMania XXIV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protect. Last protection expired and the vandals rolled in. Wrestlemania will occur in less then 2 months and this will be big target for WP:CRYSTAL. --Endless Dan 18:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Swift Fox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary full protection Vandalism, serial vandalism by IPs.Toddst1 (talk) 18:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Semi-protected one week. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 18:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

What the Bleep Do We Know!?‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protect edit warring. ScienceApologist (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Sakura Haruno (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protect high levels of vandalism. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Already protected.; user blocked 24 hours. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Who was blocked? The page is unprotected and is still under attack. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Semi-protected; one week ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 18:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Centennial College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism from the College itself. GreenJoe 17:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Declined Only one anon IP vandal; IP blocked 2 weeks. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Belford University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. It appears someone with a vested interest doesn't like the school being referenced as a Diploma mill. Richfife (talk) 17:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment Looks like just one anon - recommend warning/talk to the the user and if repeated abuse follows WP:AIV. Wisdom89 _{(T / )} 17:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

User:76.171.233.89 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Request protection - see http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:76.171.233.89&action=history. Just keeps adding "fuck you motherfucker" to the talk page. --Capitana (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Hyōhō Niten Ichi-ryū (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

protect. Second request. The user NitenBR is still reverting changes in order to superimpose a strict POV opinion on the article which is inaccurrate. Fred26 (talk) 14:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Declined. Left NitenBR a warning about the Three-Revert Rule. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Barry Chamish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary full protection Dispute, Edit warring between two users.~~ 14:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

comment Did you attempt mediation or any form of dispute resolution first? Wisdom89 _{(T / )} 14:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I have sort of come in to this as a 3rd party. I saw one post on AIV regarding the blocking of the other "edit warring" user. I warned each user about potential violation of 3RR, and posted here in an attempt to cool the tempers over it. ~~ 14:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Judge Judy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection Frequent blanking from anonymous users. JuJube (talk) 14:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Jayron32.talk.contribs 16:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Note: Protection changed to semi-protection by Jpgordon (talk · contribs). Camaron | Chris (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Associated Broadcasting Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection anon users continue to add hoax information to this article after the semi-protection expired two days ago -Danngarcia (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment As only a third party, examination of the history does reflect this activity. I would endorse a semi-protection. Wisdom89 _{(T / )} 17:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

DZOZ-TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection an anon user adds hoax information to this article similar to the edits of the Associated Broadcasting Company article -Danngarcia (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

comment Might be more appropriate to warn/attempt to talk to the anon first, and then report protracted abuse to WP:AIV. Wisdom89 _{(T / )} 15:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment Actually there are at least 2 or 3 anon users that vandalizes this page in the same manner as the ABC article. -Danngarcia (talk) 18:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment Checking the history, it appears that you are correct. You had specified a single anon user though. I also would agree that this page should be temporary semi-protected as a deterrent. Waiting for admins. Wisdom89 _{(T / )} 19:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Walt Whitman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection Pretty heavy vandalism in the past couple days. Thanks in advance, as always! --Midnightdreary (talk) 13:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Harry Potter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

unprotection , Protected since May 2007..Lilac Soul 11:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Unprotected by Can't sleep, clown will eat me (talk) ~ Riana ⁂ 13:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Naruto: Shippūden the Movie 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, this page has had a lot of vandalism, i think a 3-5 day temporary protection would be good, and help us get the page back to normal.The Last Uchiha 09:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jmlk17 10:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Sungnyemun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection : The article is on spotlight due to the big fire incident yesterday. Silly edit warring on using images or "tense". Other language wikipedia also endorse semi-protection. Maybe one weeks semi-protection is needed.--Appletrees (talk) 10:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jmlk17 10:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fucktard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Salt. Just look at the incredibly long deletion log - it's also very, very likely to be recreated as an attack page.--h i s _{r e s e a r c h} 07:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Declined. Only one recent deletion, through an AfD. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Arnold O. Beckman High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Multiple IP addresses have begun targeting the article for vandalism--there have been well over a dozen instances of vandalism today alone..jonny-mt 06:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

comment Seems to be perpetrated by a single IP Wisdom89 _{(T / )} 06:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Jayron32.talk.contribs 06:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Quaker history (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This article was given semi-protection last November to deal with anonymous vandalism that was taking place at the time. It seems that 3 months is more than enough cooling-off time, and since it was never discussed on the article's talk page I think it would be appropriate to remove the protection at this point. --Ahc (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Unprotected It's been protected for long enough. Hopefully things have calmed down since then. - auburnpilot talk 00:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Mount Vesuvius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect Article has been hit heavily by vandals in the 7x.xx.xx.xx range. Editors have been reverting them, but this has got to stop. Additionally, there is an unconfirmed possible revert war before the vandal(s) hit, but that is, once again, unconfirmed. The main reason for semi-protection is because of the vandals, who blanked sections of the page. Sandy of the CSARs (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jmlk17 04:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

KNOM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite full protection This article has been the target of frequent deletions and re-insertions of a comment that pertains to a matter currently before the courts. The (currently deleted) comment includes the name of an individual which has been noted in past press accounts of the proceeding and is, therefore, an apparently fair usage. However inclusion in this article has caused concern to members of the person's family. This comment has also been brought to my attention as a factor inhibiting at least two other potential complainants from exercising their rights. Please consider protecting this article without the comment until the court proceedings are resolved VelvetDixie (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Uhm, is there a legal issue going on? Jmlk17 04:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Rachel Carson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect - Frequent IP vandalism, of the past 50 edits (since January 25), approx. 35 were IP vandalism (or in some cases possibly tests), of the remainder at least 10 were reverts of vandalism or tests, only one constructive edit (addition of a single word) and one incorrect copyedit were made by IPs during that period. The only content dispute during that period was with a registered account, which accounts for a total of two of the fifty edits considered (the edit and one reversion).--Doug. 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Semi-protected for two weeks. Acalamari 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite full protection Is a high-use template that should be protected. MBisanz 02:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Fully protected Acalamari 02:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Prostitution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, Lot's of immature IPs vandalizing the page. Almost every other edit is a revert..Dadude3320 01:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. ~ Riana ⁂ 02:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Shrek 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, IP Vandals is vandalizing the page..ClanCC _{(T / )} 01:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf 01:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Current_events/2008_February_10 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protect or full protect to stop the revert war I allowed myself to be dragged into. 23:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)~

Declined I've warned the 2 involved edit warriors and if they continue, they'll both be blocked. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

CD-i games based on The Legend of Zelda series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Seems to be a great amount of vandalism and conflicts regarding 'Youtube Poop'.- Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jmlk17 23:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Tooth & Nail Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect or full protect long enough to get people to talk things out on the discussion page (2 weeks?). A few anonymous IP's and some actual users are in a fight over what the genre should be on the page. An attempt to get them to argue it out on the talk page and come to some consensus has been unsuccessful and it has created a ridiculous revert war since late January, with the genres listed going back and forth 3-6 times a day.--Velvet elvis81 (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jmlk17 23:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

St Helena Secondary College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. This page has been vandalized consistently for two months. This has included cyber bullying aimed at current students and teachers. Personally, I would like to see a two week semi-protect to deter the new user/IP vandals. Barras (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Declined Alexf 22:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)