Talk:Transmeta - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pocopocopocopoco (talk | contribs) at 02:30, 13 February 2008 (wikiproject companies). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:30, 13 February 2008 by Pocopocopocopoco (talk | contribs) (wikiproject companies)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

California Stub‑class

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Misplaced Pages:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

ambiguous=

Linus Torvalds has by now left Transmeta to dedicate himself to the further development of the Linux Kernel.

the above sounds a bit ambiguous - when did Torvalds actually leave Transmeta? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpjas (talk • contribs) 02:35, 16 May 2004 (UTC)

New

Does Transmeta publish their VLIW instruction set? How much info if publicly available? As I understand it, currently the processors are shipped/intergrated in an x86 only configuration, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.178.230.241 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 October 2004 (UTC)

Does Transmeta publish their VLIW instruction set? No.

How much info if publicly available? It is IP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Admiral tojo (talk • contribs) 22:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

CMS

Is the Code Morphing Software (CMS) built into the microprocessor chip itself, or is it on a separate chip ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidCary (talk • contribs) 22:56, 15 December 2004 (UTC)

Reply: Chances are, (CMS) is going to be built into the processor to help curb bottlenecks in performance. Its probably on a type of prom chip that is part of the processors core. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.216.45.125 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 2 June 2005 (UTC)

I thought Transmeta produced yoghurt and Linus Torvalds was employed as a test taster. — JIP | Talk 15:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Trivia statement

A bullet is "Can easily run Linux". The company can easily run Linux? If this is in reference to the processors, any processor can run linux as easily as any other operating system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.87.68.252 (talk • contribs) 12:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

VansHardware site

The VansHardware site referenced in footnote 4 has been established as being created by a via employee. At the time the referenced article was written via and transmeta were actively competing for the same business. I think the annotated assertions based solely on that website should be removed due to objectivity. See http://www.vanshardware.com/news/2001/september/september_news.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.100.188 (talk) 06:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Categories: