Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yamla (talk | contribs) at 04:09, 14 February 2008 (Reverted edits by Helics (talk) to last version by JoshuaZ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WP:METEO Active members

User:Juliancolton/Active

Hi

Ѕandahl has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Old English Terrier

I am not exactly sure why the Old English Terrier article keeps getting redirected to the White English Terrier article. The White English Terrier is a terrier breed that was created in the late 1800's while the Old English Terrier was created in the 1700's. The Old English Terrier was crossed with the Old English Bulldog to create most of today's Bull Terrier breeds. The fact that most of the Bull Terrier breeds are far older than the White English Terrier should give enough pause so that one can understand and grasp that a dog create over a century later cannot be the foundation stock of much older breeds.

It is my hope that objective and educational reasoning will prevail concerning the Old English Terrier vs. the English White Terrier. They are not the same breed and they never have been. Working terriers (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

general slocum fire

   am not sure if this is correct site, though I wish to be directed to list of slocum fire victims as I found out 

recently that my relatives were on the ship. It would help immensely with my geneology chart I am presently working on. I was at slocum fire site and her I am. sorry if this is off subject.---Gloriana —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.91.0 (talk) 16:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Retarded Animal Babies

A blast from the past this; currently it's a protected title. You closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Retarded Animal Babies (back in October 2006, how time flies). Because I'd commented I was left a note to say that there's a new version at User:Hamsterdunce/sandbox. I have to say that the new version looks substantially similar to me and doesn't really address the references issue. Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Requesting restoration of a page you voted to delete

Sir: I have rewritten the page on Retarded Animal Babies. My version meets all the requirements of Misplaced Pages. It includes reliable third-party citations and proper formatting and NPOV. Since there are now a number of Misplaced Pages articles that link to it, I feel that it should be remade.

The rewritten article is temporarily posted here: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Hamsterdunce/sandbox

I have only a secondary relationship with the RAB creator. This is being done as a courtesy to him--we feel that he deserves a decent representation on Misplaced Pages. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Eric Barbour (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

FYI, this is currently at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2008 February 11. Since you already replied to EricBarbour's talk, you might drop by and add your input there. — Scientizzle 04:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vincent.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vincent.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

requesting restoration: Retarded Animal Babies

I understand your objections. One problem is that, despite having more than 3 MILLION hits on Newgrounds, Mr. Lovelace has not actively pursued publicity elsewhere. Thus the lack of mainstream media references. He hasn't been saving all his press clipping (and there have been a few others--I just can't cite them for lack of information). Do you have suggestions for this problem? Thanks for any help you can give. 76.191.142.203 (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

(sorry, was logged out, I don't do a lot of Wiki work.) Eric Barbour (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Closing of DRV on Corey Worthington

I strongly protest your early close of this DRV. The previous AfD was ongoing at the time of deletion. The ArbCom and BLP make it specifically clear that DRV is the method to use in such situations. Furthermore, the presence of "3 DRVs and 3 AFDs" is due to mainly to repeated out of process attempts to delete the article, not due to any clear consensus to have it deleted. At least one ArbCom member, FT2 has expressed disagreement with this speedy deletion making it clear that BLP:UNDEL was not intended for such uses. I strongly urge you to reconsider your close. JoshuaZ (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)