Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 12:56, 16 February 2008 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Coredesat/Archive 15.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WP:METEO Active members

User:Juliancolton/Active

Hi

Ѕandahl has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Retarded Animal Babies

A blast from the past this; currently it's a protected title. You closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Retarded Animal Babies (back in October 2006, how time flies). Because I'd commented I was left a note to say that there's a new version at User:Hamsterdunce/sandbox. I have to say that the new version looks substantially similar to me and doesn't really address the references issue. Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Requesting restoration of a page you voted to delete

Sir: I have rewritten the page on Retarded Animal Babies. My version meets all the requirements of Misplaced Pages. It includes reliable third-party citations and proper formatting and NPOV. Since there are now a number of Misplaced Pages articles that link to it, I feel that it should be remade.

The rewritten article is temporarily posted here: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Hamsterdunce/sandbox

I have only a secondary relationship with the RAB creator. This is being done as a courtesy to him--we feel that he deserves a decent representation on Misplaced Pages. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Eric Barbour (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

FYI, this is currently at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2008 February 11. Since you already replied to EricBarbour's talk, you might drop by and add your input there. — Scientizzle 04:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vincent.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vincent.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

requesting restoration: Retarded Animal Babies

I understand your objections. One problem is that, despite having more than 3 MILLION hits on Newgrounds, Mr. Lovelace has not actively pursued publicity elsewhere. Thus the lack of mainstream media references. He hasn't been saving all his press clipping (and there have been a few others--I just can't cite them for lack of information). Do you have suggestions for this problem? Thanks for any help you can give. 76.191.142.203 (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

(sorry, was logged out, I don't do a lot of Wiki work.) Eric Barbour (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Closing of DRV on Corey Worthington

I strongly protest your early close of this DRV. The previous AfD was ongoing at the time of deletion. The ArbCom and BLP make it specifically clear that DRV is the method to use in such situations. Furthermore, the presence of "3 DRVs and 3 AFDs" is due to mainly to repeated out of process attempts to delete the article, not due to any clear consensus to have it deleted. At least one ArbCom member, FT2 has expressed disagreement with this speedy deletion making it clear that BLP:UNDEL was not intended for such uses. I strongly urge you to reconsider your close. JoshuaZ (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your reasonableness in this matter. JoshuaZ (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Iamandrewrice

Thanks for catching that Iamandrewrice sockpuppet so quickly. See your checkuser request, he later admitted to being Jay Turner. As a result, I blocked the accounts indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 04:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Follow-up to Daniel Malakov AfD and DRV

Dear Coredesat:

As you will recall about two months ago you & I disagreed on the validity of a Daniel Malakov encyclopedia article on Misplaced Pages. Many WP:Notability and WP:BLP claims were made by yourself and other gentle administrators. Try as I could, there seemed way to convince you that the murder of Daniel Malakov was a significant event requiring a Misplaced Pages page. The page was deleted. No discussion on the merits was permitted, IMHO, by the "Administrator echelon."

In view of the above, I wish to direct your attention to a New York Times article as follows:

February 9, 2008
Man Accused of Killing Dentist Exchanged 91 Calls With Dentist’s Wife
By CHRISTINE HAUSER and DARYL KHAN

You are free to go to nytimes.com and read the article, but perhaps the salient details are as follows:

Those details about the killing of Dr. Malakov on Oct. 28, 2007, emerged Friday from an indictment and at a news conference held by police officials and prosecutors.

As the families of both Dr. Malakov and his estranged wife looked on, Dr. Borukhova, 34, was arraigned and pleaded not guilty on Friday to charges including first-degree murder and second-degree conspiracy in an emotion-filled hearing in State Supreme Court in Queens. Mr. Mallayev, 50, faces similar charges.

The defendants could each be sentenced to life in prison without parole. They were ordered held without bail until their next court date, Friday.

At the time you folks decided to ditch the article, this information was not available. Now that it is, and more information ostensibly is to come out as the NYPD and AG begin to make their case in court, I want to know whether you will reverse your position and support an article on Daniel Malakov, or alternatively "Murder of Daniel Malakov."

If not, what would you need to see to support such an article? If you demand a conviction, then I plan to hold you to your promise.

Eileivgyrt (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)