Misplaced Pages

Talk:Reliability of /to do - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Richard001 (talk | contribs) at 07:11, 17 February 2008 (Self assessment?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:11, 17 February 2008 by Richard001 (talk | contribs) (Self assessment?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Expand : *Expand lead a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
    • Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
    • Find references where called for
    • Other : *Discuss changing the subject of the article to the broader quality of Misplaced Pages (reliability being a more narrow subject, see Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Article name
    • Images: Perhaps a screenshot of a vandalized/inaccurate edit?