< Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Richard001 (talk | contribs ) at 07:25, 17 February 2008 (Expand). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision .
Revision as of 07:25, 17 February 2008 by Richard001 (talk | contribs ) (Expand)(diff ) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff ) | Newer revision → (diff )
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Expand : *Expand lead a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
Find references where called for Other : *Discuss changing the subject (or just the name) of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. quality of Misplaced Pages , quality and comprehensiveness of Misplaced Pages , evaluation of Misplaced Pages , assessment of Misplaced Pages , appraisal of Misplaced Pages , perspectives on Misplaced Pages , reception of Misplaced Pages etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Article name ). Discuss overlap with criticism of Misplaced Pages and clarify the scope of the two articles.
Images: Perhaps a screenshot of a vandalized/inaccurate edit?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
**DISCLAIMER** We are not affiliated with Wikipedia, and Cloudflare.
The information presented on this site is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.
You should always have a personal consultation with a healthcare professional before making changes to your diet, medication, or exercise routine.
AI helps with the correspondence in our chat.
We participate in an affiliate program. If you buy something through a link, we may earn a commission 💕
↑