This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Altenmann (talk | contribs) at 19:49, 17 February 2008 (Reverted edits by Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) to last version by Mikkalai). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:49, 17 February 2008 by Altenmann (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) to last version by Mikkalai)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| “ | I believe that any study which would question and deconstruct rather than defend, excuse or accuse various institutions is worth the effort. | ” |
| — Irina Livezeanu
| ||
|
Any messages left here will probably not be unanswered. Article content is to be discussed in article talk pages. (You may invite me there if you find my input important). |
Aristocrunks
Do you have any interest in editing this article or knowing an editor who might? Lord T & Eloise seems to have notability (beyond a Grammy snapshot), but the article needs work that I don't feel comfortable doing. I added this to the talk page if you or others want to provide feedback: Talk:Lord T & Eloise#Notability and tone. Thanks. Flowanda | Talk 02:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Dispute about Russian
Hi -- I'm involved with WikiProject Central Asia. There is a current conflict between two editors regarding Russian naming conventions. I don't know the whole scope of the conflict, but (some of the) relevant discussion and links are here: WikiProject Central Asia talk. Could you take a look? This needs someone who can read Russian (unlike me). Thanks! Aelfthrytha (talk) 22:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)