Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Moreschi (talk | contribs) at 15:55, 20 February 2008 (→Blocked: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Archive 1: February 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive2 : June 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive3 : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; Archive4 : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; Archive5 : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; Archive6 : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; Archive7 : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; Archive8 : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007;

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bharatveer

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision can be found at the link above. Bharatveer is subject to a comprehensive editing restriction for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. If he exceeds this limit, fails to discuss a content reversion, or makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked as set forth in the decision's enforcement provision. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 19:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Mappila Malayalam

In view of your contributions to Malayalam language, Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mappila Malayalam may benefit from your input. Please consider participating in that discussion. -- Jreferee t/c 06:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

St. Thomas Mount

Did you look at the page in question? "Hostile" is not my personal opinion. My PERSONAL opinion is "vicious" and "nasty". And I'm an agnostic. I imagine an actual Catholic would be really offended. "Hostile" is a fair and impartial assessment of the page. Or "antagonistic". Please have a look for yourself. External links out of Misplaced Pages don't normally present a point of view so opposed to the page it is linking from. Not in my experience anyway. Is there a non-controversial, recommended method for identifying a link of this kind? Thanks. Varlaam (talk) 16:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC) (in Toronto)

Political integration of India

I notice you've reverted the changes I'd made to this article. The article is currently under consideration for de-featuring and, as I said in my edit summary, the changes were intended to meet concerns raised in the removal process. It seemed to me that the concerns raised there required a rewrite of the article, which I attempted to do. Would you please mind discussing precisely what your concerns with the changes were? -- Arvind (talk) 11:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Carnatic Music

Hello Bharatveer

I agree with your earlier comments

"Parthy, I reverted because i felt it was a simple case of tamil pov pushing( inserting tamil font in front of kannada and some childish remarks regarding vedic infuence etc ).

 + It is none of your business to ask me to spend time on this article. Hope you stop this sort of unfriendly acts. Bharatveer 08:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)"

I have same opinion and trying to fix it though getting reverted again and again. I have tried one more time.

Knataka

Indian religions

Bharatveer, I've noted your good edits on the Indian religions page. Trouble is, there is a Jain cleric called AnishShah19, who is vandalizing there saying Jainism evolved alongside the 1500 BC Vedic age, and also that Jainism is as old as Indus Valley civilization. He goes on to give a dozen speculative sources and tries to pass them off as confirmed accepted fact.

I would request your help there in reversion of his edits and arguments in the talk page (if possible, as it is huge by now). Just try if you find time and patience. Thanx. Indian_Air_Force (IAF) (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Vivekananda and Ayyavazhi

Hello Bharatveer,

I noticed that there have been frequent inclusions and then subsequent deletions (by you) of the material relating to Swami Vivekananda and Ayyavazhi. It looks like the Ayyavazhi editors will continue to restore your deletions. (And you no doubt will continue to delete them!) I wonder if a solution could be found by including that material on one of the Ayyavazhi pages. Perhaps a short note on the Vivekananda page could direct to the new location. (I also mentioned this to the last reverter).

Devadaru (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Looks like Paul Raj is also satisfied now.

Devadaru (talk) 10:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

24 hours for undiscussed reversions of good-faith edits. Moreschi 15:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)