Misplaced Pages

User talk:ජපස

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ජපස (talk | contribs) at 13:43, 24 February 2008 (Another day, another block. I love you all.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:43, 24 February 2008 by ජපස (talk | contribs) (Another day, another block. I love you all.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

(Yet another) WQA report

Someone filed a WQA report, which can be found WP:WQA#Complaint against ScienceApologist. Surprised no one has mentioned it to you yet. seicer | talk | contribs 02:03, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

And now WP:AE#Complaint against ScienceApologist. I'm not for sure if the user is canvassing around or if he wasn't satisfied with the original answers from some editors. seicer | talk | contribs 02:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for 96 hours

Blocked for 96 hours for breaking your arbcom civility and AGF restrictions. You only struck the comment after the AN/AE thread was started, so your post on AN/AE mischaracterises your handling of this matter. You clearly did not intend to strike your comment prior to this. Obviously the previous shortened block did not have the desired effect. You are not allowed to be incivil and then recant - the arbcom case requires that you do not be incivil in the first place! John Vandenberg (talk) 03:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I noticed this, this morning. Sorry to hear about you being blocked again. As you see from my comments on the Bleep talk page, I think it is hardly worth while staying here. It was interesting learning about the film, but this is so obviously a losing battle. I am going to make the crisps with my son, now, and try and put this short episode behind me. With very best wishes. The Rationalist (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ජපස (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please see WP:AE#Complaint against ScienceApologist. There seems to be some misunderstanding that the blocking admin had with regards to the timeline. Please unblock me so that a proper review can be made of the situatiaon at AE. ScienceApologist (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please see ]. There seems to be some misunderstanding that the blocking admin had with regards to the timeline. Please unblock me so that a proper review can be made of the situatiaon at AE. ] (]) 13:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please see ]. There seems to be some misunderstanding that the blocking admin had with regards to the timeline. Please unblock me so that a proper review can be made of the situatiaon at AE. ] (]) 13:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please see ]. There seems to be some misunderstanding that the blocking admin had with regards to the timeline. Please unblock me so that a proper review can be made of the situatiaon at AE. ] (]) 13:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: