This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Historian info (talk | contribs) at 05:50, 27 February 2008 (→Good work- well done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:50, 27 February 2008 by Historian info (talk | contribs) (→Good work- well done)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
February 2008Welcome. King Lopez 11:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC) ThanksThanks for helping with my userbox--MJ Digs (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
RFA thanks.: RFA thanks :.
Admin coachingI added a few more questions to your coaching page. Useight (talk) 22:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Your PastThose blocks were just over 1 year ago. Many editors feel that you have to be 6 months block-free, so you have that. However, there were two blocks in short succession, which could make the average !voter go from 6 months to 1 year. But, they were a year ago and you only had the account for a month at the time. I think you'll be fine. Useight (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
--Nadir D Steinmetz 11:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Good work- well doneHi King Lopez pleased to meet you, well done for reverting vandalism on the Jat people article. I thank you. The reason why there are so many vandals on the Jat people article is because its about a ethnic group and so it attracts alot racist vandalizers. Please can you put it in your watch list we need all the help we can get. A good idea is maybe tell 3-4 other experienced wikipedians to keep an eye on it in their watchlists so we can all keep eye on it and prevent vanadalism. The main things to watch out for in vandalism attempts are 1. Page blankings 2. Removal or references 3. Hate racist or negative comments about this ethnic group and other general hate negative statements. Please can you put it in your watch list we need all the help we can get. A good idea is tell 3-4 other experienced wikipedians to keep it in their watchlist and watch and check for 1. Page blankings 2. Removal or references 3. Hate racist or negative comments about this ethnic group and other general hate negative statements. I hope you can help - we need to reduce ethnic hate in the world so please protect the article. best regards. --Historian info (talk) 15:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I think your suggestion of getting semi-protection on the article is an excellent way to protect it from racism. The reason why semi protection is an excellent idea for Jat people article is because of the following:
In short getting semi-protection for the article would stop vast majority (99%) of the vandal attacks. Finally, it would reduce the workload long-term for wikipedians who are trying to protect the article, like you & me. Coaching pageYes, it's looking real nice now. It's the first one I've seen that had some actual formatting instead of just text. Useight (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) |