Misplaced Pages

User talk:Toddst1

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kakofonous (talk | contribs) at 05:43, 7 March 2008 (→RfA nom page created: ohnoes!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:43, 7 March 2008 by Kakofonous (talk | contribs) (→RfA nom page created: ohnoes!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is Toddst1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10


edit count | edit summary usage



Archives

User talk:Toddst1/archive3



RfA nom page created

Kakofonous would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Kakofonous to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Toddst1 . If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Kakofonous (talk) 02:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

You forgot to accept! --Kakofonous (talk) 05:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Long Xuyen

Because this is an editor from Vietnam, and presumably they know who is notable and who isn't (and those redlinks, consequently, would lead to articles). If you want to know who the people are, just ask the editor. WP editing shouldn't be a combat. Badagnani (talk) 02:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Not meant to be combative, rather, dealing with vandalism. Specifically, this edit was flagged by Lupin's anti-vandal tool which brought me to the article. After reverting the vandalism, I thought would clean the article up. I'm surprised you're seeing it differently - especially since I said what I was doing, following which policies, in my edit summary. Toddst1 (talk) 02:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, that edit is disturbing. Probably the editor is about 14 years old. However, there may be good mixed with the bad. Badagnani (talk) 03:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. 8-) Cheers! Toddst1 (talk) 03:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)