This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClockworkSoul (talk | contribs) at 00:22, 11 March 2008 (→Fair warning: My mistake.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:22, 11 March 2008 by ClockworkSoul (talk | contribs) (→Fair warning: My mistake.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice I didn't know how that was done.(Gordon24fan (talk) 20:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC))
Blocked for vandalism and WP:BLP violations
You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.You have been warned multiple times by various users (, , , ) and have removed these warnings, which is a sign of bad faith. Warnings were issued for a variety of reasons as indicated above and may be perused by examining the rationale for the complaints. In my case it was violations of WP:BLP by changing sourced birth years to unsourced ones (, ) and removing references that cite material for living people (). Other examples of inserting false information that did not garner a warning include: , and possibly others. Earlier edits seemed to indicate a willingness to contribute positively, including admonishing others for the very behavior that you are now engaging in, such as adding unsourced material.
Please review some of Misplaced Pages's core policies regarding citing sources, especially on pages about living people, so that you may contribute positively after the block has expired. Cheers, CP 23:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I got rid of the other notes because i didn't want my discussion page to get to big thats not vandalism. It is not bad faith. I changed Isacc Bruce's birthdate because Fox News said something else. I don't know how to put references on. This is a very stupid block.
Decline reason:
Whether removing the warnings was bad faith or not is immaterial; you have been warned and persisted. I am reseting your block to a full 24h in view of your creation of a sockpuppet to faux-accept your unblock request. — Coren 23:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't create another account because its impossible my ip is blocked as well.
Decline reason:
Did too. User:Gordon24fan, User:Crackerstackerman, and User:Bronxkingmeez are all the same person.]--jpgordon 01:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I've left this message before and I see that I need to leave it again: You should be adding the season highlights to Misplaced Pages, not every time someone spins out. Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information. "Misplaced Pages considers the historical notability of persons and events." Please acquire the perspective that what we doing is creating content about the history of a person, not every time that they spin out or have problems. You should be concentrating on the people that win the race, not everyone that has problems. Royalbroil 05:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Admin?
In this edit, you claim to be an admin, but I don't see you on the list of administrators. Care to explain? - Philippe | Talk 00:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- I, however, AM an admin. I strongly suggest that you immediately withdraw that comment for a couple of reasons. First, there's no such thing as a "hide" admin. Second, being an admin gives you no additional power in content disputes. - Philippe | Talk 00:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've removed the admin userbox from your userpage. It is not true, you are not an admin. By contributing to Misplaced Pages in a constructive and neutral way, over time, it very well may be true, but right now, you shouldn't have an admin userbox as it is misleading. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- I have blocked you for a week for disruption, there is no such thing as a "secret agent admin", this is not the first time that you have been blocked and that was taken under consideration before issuing said block. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Reversion
Please do not revert sensible edits, such as mine for Lieutenant Governor of New York David A. Paterson, to Eliot Spitzer, without talking on the talk page of the article. I am not a vandal, I do not commit vandalism, and I object strongly to that characterization, as you did at . Bearian (talk) 00:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Disruption? I was told to provide the specific source to Fox News. I did and i get banned anyways. That page is getting vandalized like 9 times a minute i tried to get the facts in, but i can't stop everything.
Decline reason:
You weren't blocked for that. You were blocked for claiming to be an admin, first to another user and then to me. — - Philippe | Talk 00:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was trying to stop vandalism on the Eliot Spitzer page i posed to be an admin so people would stop vandalizing pages as much. I didn't know you couldn't do that im new to this website and to the rules.
Decline reason:
Then you should have told admin, or at least not posed as admin to an admin. The decision is final.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Fair warning
I hate to see it come to this, but you have had a history of less than civil behavior and misrepresentation of yourself and your actions. This block is currently set for two weeks. The next one will very likely be indefinite. Consider this a friendly warning from somebody who has seen this happen too many times before. – ClockworkSoul 00:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Correction, the block is currently set for ONE week. - Philippe | Talk 00:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- My mistake. – ClockworkSoul 00:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Correction, the block is currently set for ONE week. - Philippe | Talk 00:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)