Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hut 8.5 (talk | contribs) at 19:08, 15 March 2008 (note). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Cjneversleeps/Corrections.com

An admin userfied an article here and it has not been worked on since. Was originally tagged for speedy as A7. Reads like an advertisement for a non-notable web site. Fails the spirit of WP:USER. Redfarmer (talk) 13:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: Judging by a comment left on my talk page, this is a conflict of interest as it is the organization itself writing the article. Redfarmer (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
• AGF much? Give him more than a few days to work on it. We have userfied articles that have gone months without work. If he had left this in his subpage for a long time without working on it, that would be one thing. But it has been a grand total of five days, and he has indicated that he intends to work on it. And I agree that there is a probable conflict of interest, but I will be watching to ensure that it remains neutral, verified and exhibits notability. seresin | wasn't he just...? 21:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - These are learning opportunities that should not be lost by making an editor steaming mad that his or her userpage draft has been deleted. Especially if Seresin is going to watch (maybe even mentor? - we can hope). Nothing wrong with you explaining your concerns to the user though and maybe together we can get the user to contribute valuable information in an area of expertise without writing ad copy.--Doug. 04:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep for now at least - it was only userfied a few days ago, give them a chance. Hut 8.5 14:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep everything that's nominated for MfD. Obuibo Mbstpo (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Note this user has applied this comment to everything currently on MfD. Hut 8.5 19:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)