Misplaced Pages

:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2008-03-17/Arbitration report - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost | 2008-03-17

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by David.Mestel (talk | contribs) at 17:34, 17 March 2008 (writing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:34, 17 March 2008 by David.Mestel (talk | contribs) (writing)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost


The Report on Lengthy Litigation

By David Mestel, 17 March, 2008

The Arbitration Committee closed four case this week, and opened one case,leaving only two currently open.

Closed cases

  • Franco-Mongol alliance: A case involving alleged misconduct over a dispute on Franco-Mongol alliance and related articles. As a result of the case, PHG was prohibited from editing articles relating to medieval or ancient history for a period of one year.
  • Mantanmoreland: A case involving alleged sockpuppetry by Mantanmoreland, which he denies. In a decision, the committee found that a "definitive conclusion" cannot be reached, placed some articles on article probation, placed restrictions on current and future editors to the articles, and imposed a topic ban and direction only to edit from one account on Mantanmoreland. After the case was closed, Mantanmoreland was indefinitely blocked per this discussion, and a request for clarification was opened on the permissibility of this.
  • Ehud Lesar: A case involving a dispute involving Ehud Lesar, with alleged sockpuppetry on his part and alleged harassment by Fedayee, Eupator and others. As a result of the case, the committee found that there was insufficient evidence of sockpuppetry and overturned the block.

New case

Voting phase

  • Highways 2: A case involving editing by NE2 on articles relating to WikiProject U.S. Roads, allegedly against consensus of other editors involved with that wikiproject. A remedy has been proposed, with the support of five arbitrators, counselling editors to consider contributing outside of disputed articles. Other remedies admonishing NE2 "to act with more awareness of the general needs of his co-editors and non-specialists", and encouraging him and other editors of the roads wikiproject in their work have the support of four arbitrators.