This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hrafn (talk | contribs) at 17:43, 25 March 2008 (→Creation Safaris: creationism's lunatic fringe). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:43, 25 March 2008 by Hrafn (talk | contribs) (→Creation Safaris: creationism's lunatic fringe)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Creationism Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Response section
I'd like to make a request for a condensation of the response section, given how incredibly outweighed the positive responses to the documentary are by negative ones. I just don't think it needs to be quite that long. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.232.115 (talk) 07:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I would tend to agree, the current version gives WP:UNDUE weight to the Creationists's reviews. I would suggest that the Creation Safaris part be reduced to, at most, a single-sentence mention (they really aren't a prominent Creationist group), and that the other Creationist comments be compressed and the Nature review be given more space than a bare mention. HrafnStalk 08:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Creation Safaris
I am sorry this section got trimmed back. I think they had such incredible commentary on the documentary.--Filll (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- It came across as the ranting of a non-notable element of creationism's lunatic fringe to me. Who exactly is Creation Safaris? I see them occasionally ELed on Creationism articles, but I have never seen them mentioned by reliable sources. HrafnStalk 17:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)