Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pixelface (talk | contribs) at 04:43, 27 March 2008 (+deletion sorting: Fictional characters, Television). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

South park animals

South park animals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

In-universe list for which I can see no use. Was tagged for speedy, but does not meet any of the criteria. J Milburn (talk) 22:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Indiscriminate and unsourced information, full of original research ("Kevin may or may not be an animal"), difficult to verify, in-universe... you name it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Fancruft. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • "Cruft" is never a good argument per Misplaced Pages:ITSCRUFT, , and Misplaced Pages:Cruftcruft. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Original research. Cambrasa (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - per above. --Starionwolf (talk) 01:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • per votes are generally considered weak. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as acceptable and discrminate spinoff article and subarticle of notable franchise that can easily be verfied. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, original research, fancruft, indiscriminate list. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Fiction and the arts)
• AfD debates