Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Religion and schizotypy - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gabrielsimon (talk | contribs) at 02:58, 7 August 2005 (once again, all you ever do is pick on people and throw your opinions around, your comments are in bad faith and will be deleted, again if i have to, anyone wishing to help can.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:58, 7 August 2005 by Gabrielsimon (talk | contribs) (once again, all you ever do is pick on people and throw your opinions around, your comments are in bad faith and will be deleted, again if i have to, anyone wishing to help can.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Religion and schizotypy

This totally non-notable page is likley to be little more than an paean against religion. Hipocrite 01:42, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep Could be a great article soon. CanadianCaesar 02:18, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - As described by User:SlimVirgin on the discussion page, "I can see there being a good article on religion and mental illness, but as this page stands, it's POV, unencyclopedic in the style it's written, and it has no sources. My suggestion is that it be deleted, and the creator (or someone else) puts it on a user subpage and works on it there, until it's ready to face the public, as it were." Also, singling out schizotypy as a specific disorder to mention in the title is really quite odd as it's just one minor classification out of a whole range that would be important for a comparison between religion and psychology in general or mental disorders more specifically. If the article stayed around waiting for cleanup it would just get redirectede to a real article on the topic under a better name, and this title is so specific it's really unnecessary as a redirect as nobody would think to go looking for it instead of, say, Religion and psychology or Religion and mental disorders or whatnot. This article is a completely unsalvagable mess. DreamGuy 02:29, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

Comment--your outnumbered, dreamguy. guess that means consensus will be keep.Gabrielsimon 02:33, 7 August 2005 (UTC)