This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.164.70.243 (talk) at 03:31, 10 August 2005 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:31, 10 August 2005 by 69.164.70.243 (talk) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Standards of measure in the Medieval East
One of a substantial number of articles by the same user that consists of original research of no value. Egil 14:41, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- This is what Misplaced Pages has to say on the subject.
- "research that consists of collecting and organizing information
- from existing primary and/or secondary sources is strongly encouraged.
- In fact, all articles on Misplaced Pages should be based on information collected
- from primary and secondary sources. This is not "original research,"
- it is "source-based research," and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia."
- No vote as of yet. This appears to be only an (unwikified) list of the names of units of measure, presented without info about what they measure or where they were used. Not sure I grasp how this is original research, assuming that the use of these units can be verified. Better these than Satan's SI system. Leaning towards cleanup and keep. Smerdis of Tlön 15:40, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, Valuable, well researched, well cited, interesting, informative. Rktect 7:25, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
dispute is in mediation
- Delete as it seems a soon to be original research entry like the ohtrs the author has contributed. <drini ☎> 16:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete original research. See drini's comment in Standards of measure in the Near Eastern Bronze Age vote for reasoning. Ken 17:05, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, original research. Nandesuka 16:42, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, as it currently stands the article consists of nothing but a list and zero useful information. Xaa 00:12, 6 August 2005 (UTC)