This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wizardman (talk | contribs) at 03:58, 21 April 2008 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:58, 21 April 2008 by Wizardman (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was delete)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Accidental pedagogy
- Accidental pedagogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article doesn't make a lot of sense, actually. The first sentence talks about "pure accident" but doesn't really say what could be learned in this way, and the second sentence serves only to disparage LMS. I don't see anything really salvageable here. nneonneo 05:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- Merge with Learning management systems. Essentially just a comment about a bigger topic. Nick Connolly (talk) 06:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Another user already noted that the article had no content a while ago at User talk:Aneesha. nneonneo 21:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No content. Term appears to be a takeoff on a book titled Beyond Accidental Pedagogy. Squidfryerchef (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Totally unsourced and doesn't make sense. --Orlady (talk) 17:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.