This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wizardman (talk | contribs) at 13:22, 21 April 2008 (start). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:22, 21 April 2008 by Wizardman (talk | contribs) (start)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Matsuo Bashō
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page
- Result pending I am asking for a reassessment/delisting as it fails section two of the good article criteria, "It is factually accurate and verifiable." More accurately, it fails 2b, "at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". With virtually no inline citations I don't see this as a GA. Wizardman 13:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)