This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Girolamo Savonarola (talk | contribs) at 21:29, 11 August 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:29, 11 August 2005 by Girolamo Savonarola (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- Category_talk:Dialogues_of_Plato - debate about whether or not to change naming standard en masse. We're starting to wrap things up (I hope) and would like a few more people to weigh in on some final issues. --Girolamo Savonarola 21:29, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Truth - Revert war about changes to introductory paragraph. Edits by anonymous user involve unnecessary archiving of very recent and relevant material and editing of the comments of other users; repeated reversion and referring to the comments of others as "obscurantist" and "vandalism" . See also talk:true 21:06, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- talk:atheism NPOV complaint about deletion of links which criticize atheism.
- Otherkin - I feel there is a severe lack of observation of verifiability and no original research in this article. Content comes mainly from a few websites which I consider dubious sources. Particularly, one editor is of the opinion that normal Misplaced Pages policy and guidelines should not apply to this article. Friday 23:31, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- Adi Shankara — there has for some time been a battle between editors who wish to state dates for Shankara that are accepted by most scholarly authorities (religious, philosophical, and historical), and those who wish to give more weight to the very different view of a set of religious institutions connected with Shankara. 21:42, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Libertarianism. There is a proposal to move the page to Libertarianism (capitalist). Should the page retain its current location (which is more in line with common use) or should "libertarianism" be a disambiguation page between the different uses, which may be fairer? 12:32, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- This question is not written from a NPOV, because it assumes there are different uses (that are noteworthy in an encyclopedia) of the term "libertarianism", which is a point in contention. --Serge 18:39, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Ad hominem Should the article include the neologism "Inverted Ad Hominem"? There is concern that the term itself has very rare usage and its meaning is not self-evident. It was invented several months ago by the same person who inserted it into the Misplaced Pages article. He claims that recognition of the fallacy supports its own inclusion. 09:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)