Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/wolfpawz - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wisdom89 (talk | contribs) at 20:56, 26 April 2008 (→Discussion: snow close?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:56, 26 April 2008 by Wisdom89 (talk | contribs) (→Discussion: snow close?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Wolfpawz

Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 18:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Wolfpawz (talk · contribs) - I am an applicant for admin with a technical background. I have been programming in PHP, VB, and C# for over three years. I have had an account on wikipedia for 3 years or so (my old account is no longer in-use). I am a CVU member and I currently work to restore articles that have been wrecked by trolls. Wolfpawz (talk) 18:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: I would mainly prefer to work with anti-Vandalism as I do now. I have the most skills and experience in that area.
2. What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
A: I have edited a few articles that have to do with the autism/aspie spectrum to ensure a neutral view point.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: N/A.


General comments

RfAs for this user:

    Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Wolfpawz before commenting.

    Discussion

    Support
    1. weak support. Dan Beale-Cocks 19:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    2. Moral Support - Give yourself another 4-5 months of editing here, learn about the Wiki. Visit as many areas as you possibly can. Read WP:ADMIN and possibly get yourself an WP:ADMINCOACH. Cheers. Wisdom89 (T / ) 19:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    3. Moral Support Given enough time and experience, you too can become an admin. Just not yet. --Sharkface/C 20:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    Oppose
    1. Oppose sorry, but with only 12 edits (apart from this RfA) there is nowhere near enough evidence available to judge if you have the knowledge of policy and ability to act on it in an appropriate manner. I suggest you withdraw this request, since it is highly likely to fail. Keep making constructive contributions to the encyclopedia, and consider an editor review in 3-4 months to see how you are doing. Best, Gwernol 18:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    2. Agree with Gwernol. Keep up your good editing, and come back to RfA in a few months. Assuming you continue to make solid and productive contributions, I'll be happy to support at that time. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    3. Oppose. Gwernol's right, you should stick around on that account for a while longer so we can see that you are a civil, hard working admin-hopeful. Come back in six months or so, and I'll definitely support you next time. Regards, weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 18:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    4. Oppose per Gwernol. Macy (Review me!) 19:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    Neutral