This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BJBot (talk | contribs) at 12:05, 9 May 2008 (BJBot, Image:MahaVishnu.jpg is going to be deleted). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:05, 9 May 2008 by BJBot (talk | contribs) (BJBot, Image:MahaVishnu.jpg is going to be deleted)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)"Misplaced Pages exists in a state of quantum significance flux. It's simultaneously a shining, flawless collection of incontrovertible information, and a debased pile of meaningless words thrown together by uneducated lemurs with political agendas. It simply cannot exist in any state between these two extremes. You can test this yourself by expressing a reasonable opinion about the site in any public space. Whatever words you type, they will be interpreted by readers as supporting one of these two opposing views." - Lore Sjöberg, Wired
 Archives |
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sankirtan Movement.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sankirtan Movement.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
An acknowledgment
|
Original Barnstar | |
| A humble award for your tireless efforts to improve Hinduism related content on wikipedia, and protect it from vandals and POV warriors. It is always a pleasure to interact and collaborate with you. Abecedare (talk) 07:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC) |
I can't believe I haven't acknowledged your efforts till date! I hope you appreciate the iconography. Regards. Abecedare (talk) 07:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- I am glad to get your spirits up! Among the various editors I interacted with when I first stared editing here in 2006, I see only DaGizza, Priyananth and you still around reverting vandalism/misguided edits and adding quality content. I hope your efforts will continue and, even more importantly, that you'll continue to derive pleasure from the process. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 04:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Undid your potentially libellous material insertion
Please note that it is the policy that editors must take particular care adding biographical material about a living person to any Misplaced Pages page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to the law in Florida, United States and to our content policies.WP:LIVING
Please note that you can not add such unverifiable material from your or someone elses own blog or blogsite to the page of LP ether. Besides it should be ALSO comply with this policy: The views of critics should be represented if they are relevant to the subject's notability and can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, and so long as the material is written in a manner that does not overwhelm the article or appear to side with the critics; rather, it needs to be presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. WP:LIVING
Probably most important rule is: Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. An important rule of thumb when writing biographical material about living persons is "do no harm".WP:LIVING
Your insertion/revertion was not in encyclopedic tone and did not place any reliable sourse in the text. Dipika site or any site is not a reliable source for such a content. Please also see:WP:LIBEL - all contributors should recognize that it is their responsibility to ensure that material posted on Misplaced Pages is not defamatory.
I appreciate your understanding. Wikidas (talk) 09:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Rasa-Lila
Can we work on this lead sentence?
"The Rasa lila or Rasa dance is a dance included in the traditional story of Krishna, as described in the religious texts of Hinduism."
I had "The Rasa-lila, also known as the “rasa dance” and as the “Dance of Love”, is a pastime of Krishna..."
I like using the news style, based on the way I read stuff on the Internet- I skim and I rarely read articles all the way through.
But really, based on this, I think that we should change the first sentence. We're looking for "the shortest possible relevant characterization of the subject." In my opinion, "pastime of Krishna" is this. That is what it is. If you don't know what a pastime is, you can't understand what it is. It's like "The Ford Thunderbird is a car manufactured in the United States by the Ford Motor Company.", "The Rasa-lila is a pastime of Krishna." It is not fundamentally a dance, it is fundamentally a pastime. And I'm not just speaking from and ISKCON perspective, am I? And all of this kowtowing to "Krishna is a mythological figure in stories". I'm not saying he isn't. What I'm saying is that we don't need to bend our backs saying again and again that it is a story only. I think it's fine to say that it's a pastime, because if you don't think pastimes are real then you don't have to believe it's real, but you do have to believe that it's a pastime. Do you agree with this? All I'm saying is that "pastime" is a more specific, descriptive word for what the rasa-lila is considered to be than "dance" or "story". And that's how WP is cool, you know, you say "Hmm, it's a pastime? Hmm, what's a pastime? Oh, that's what a pastime is". It's like the article for some sports car should say "the such-and-so car is a sports car" rather than "the such-and-so car is a vehicle." It's just more precise than "dance" or "story"- it doesn't make it opinionated, does it? But really, I don't know why I'm writing this, if I were you I don't think I'd change my opinion because somebody wrote this, so I am also going to go do something else.
Also, for the same reason that is better to be more defined, as defined as possible, "Bhagavat purana and gita-govinda" is better than "the religious texts of Hinduism" . (Did you notice that I didn't put "Srimad Bhagavatam"? Hahaha, I know how to behave in the material word of WP, hahaha.) Ys, David G Brault (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
The SB quote is actually found at the end of the chapter on Rasa-lila- it is in reference to it. Ys, David G Brault (talk) 02:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I suppose you're right, and there was no reason for it to be there. So, according to Prabhupad you can put on a performance of pastimes like in Ramayana performances- but then you can't even think or dream about imitating pastimes. It is a little confusing to me and I interpreted it that performing it was bad when I read the chapter on Rasa-Lila in the Krishna book, but now I realize that Prabhupad is OK with putting on the Ramayana and stuff, but it seems that that would be thinking about imitating it. Do you know the significance of the term "imitating" to Prabhupad? Ys, David G Brault (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Vaishnavism wikiproject
- Hello GourangaUk. There is now a Vaishnava project located at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Hinduism/Vaishnavism, a project for edifying Vaishnava related articles. Also, there is now a talk page for Vaishnava related discussions located at, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Hinduism/Vaishnavism. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Vaishnavism's relation to Vedic religion
Hello GourangaUK. I have added this discussion to the Vaishnavism Wikiproject talk page at, Vaishnavism's relation to Vedic religion. Please feel free to add any comments. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Paramhamsa
Thanks for the edt. I merge this article with the old article Paramhansa. Juthani1 (talk) 00:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Articles related to Hinduism
Shri Gouranga Guruji, I have posted two articles on wiki - one on Govardhan sila and another on Banalinga.They are not yet categorised under Hinduism.You may like to review them in view of your deep interest and editing skills on such subjects. Regards--Nvvchar (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Krishna article and avatar discussion
Hello GourangaUK. There is a discussion on Krishna's status as avatar at Krishna and Vishnu avatar discussion. Any comments you have would be appreciated. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
View AfD - Articles for deletion/Sacinandana Swami (2nd nomination))
GourangaUK, Please note that the discussion you were taking part in is being reopened with a veiw for deletion of article Sacinandana Swami as a possible result of the 2nd Nomination. Wikidās ॐ 20:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
New Articles
GourangaUK, after the recent Afd discussions on ISKCON leaders, I must admit to you that I was wrong concerning the articles Sacinandana Swami and Indradyumna Swami. If there are any related articles that you feel need to be created, please let me know and I will work with you. I have already began work on an ISKCON article, Gour Govinda Swami. Again I apologise for being wrong on the above two articles, please let me know if I can be of any help. I am not anti-ISKCON, so please let me know of any areas that I may help with or new articles that need to be made. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 06:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Vaisnava-Sahajiya and Vaishnavism
Please note the discussion on Vaisnava-Sahajiya and Vaishnavism, per Sri Ramananda Raya article. The discussion is located at, Vaisnava-Sahajiya and Vaishnavism. Any thoughts you have would be appreciated. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gouranga
There has been a lot of debate on Talk:Krishna about the extent to which Gaudiya Vaishnava views should in the article. One of the editors followed my suggestion to create a new page on Krishna from the Gaudiya perspective (similar to Ganesha outside Hinduism, Buddha in Hinduism and Jesus in Islam) called Svayam bhagavan but the article still may not adhere to WP:NPOV. Since you are knowledgeable in this area, if you have the time I hope you can keep an eye on both the Krishna and SB articles. Thanks Gizza 02:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Would you like to add another tradition to the list
| Invitation to create a Krishna centered Hinduism project | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
){kind=link}
){kind=link}