Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Eye movement in ordinary tasks - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.170.13.119 (talk) at 22:52, 21 May 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:52, 21 May 2008 by 67.170.13.119 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Eye movement in ordinary tasks

Eye movement in ordinary tasks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Prod declined by author; escalating to next deletion step. Strange history - author originally cited his/her own work, then changed it. Too specific of an article title/subject with little supporting text - article consists of pictures and explanations. Probably WP:COPYVIO of new cited paper, but hard to tell as it's in German. Tan | 39 21:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete - I'm not against foreign languages, but the salient points of this article are in German and aren't really of use to an English reader. Perhaps an article from the German Misplaced Pages needs to be translated?  Frank  |  talk  22:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, short and insufficient context. WillOakland (talk) 22:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I plan to add other examples to add to this article. I had already added one (eye movements in walking), but this was deleted without apparent reason.

I originally planned to add articles on eye-movements in language reading, in stress situations, in in chess - translated and adapted from my publication Hans-Werner Hunziker, (2006) Im Auge des Lesers: foveale und periphere Wahrnehmung - vom Buchstabieren zur Lesefreude Transmedia Stäubli Verlag Zürich 2006 ISBN 978-3-7266-0068-6. Now I do not know if this is against Misplaced Pages standards even if I cite the original sources on which the articles in my book are based. Maybe someone can help me with this. Thanks.--Hans-Werner34 (talk) 10:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Categories: