This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jefffire (talk | contribs) at 12:10, 22 May 2008 (→Reply to Ncmvocalist). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:10, 22 May 2008 by Jefffire (talk | contribs) (→Reply to Ncmvocalist)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Reply to Ncmvocalist
Ncmvocalist would throw out all evidence of content from this dispute. However, WP:NPOV (including WP:UNDUE), WP:NOR, and WP:V are all core policies. To say that core policies cannot be discussed at RfC is nonsense. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 11:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps you don't understand how Misplaced Pages works in relation to dispute resolution, so I'll make it clearer for you.
- Those core policies you mention are content policies - disputes over article content, including disputes over how best to follow the neutral point of view policy, belong in an Article RfC. This is a request for comment on user conduct, and involves conduct policies like WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, WP:EDITWAR etc. Please follow due process. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- My understanding is that this isn't about how to apply policy, but refusal to understand and apply policy, which is very much a conduct issue. Jefffire (talk) 12:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)