This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jossi (talk | contribs) at 01:47, 6 June 2008 (→Blocked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:47, 6 June 2008 by Jossi (talk | contribs) (→Blocked)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)If you want to leave a message,
you can just click here!
You can also send me an e-mail.
Your Userpage/AN
I'm glad I was able to help out, even if only a little bit. It did end up to be a productive discussion, I think, and I hope it proves useful in the future. As for your userpage, it appears to have been protected in December by User:Nick, citing privacy concerns (diff). I've unprotected the page, so you should have no further problems editing it. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Best, UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 16:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, really. Unfortunately, so far this discussion is productive only with you, independently from the fact whether you agree or not with me - at least there is an exchange of explanations between two human beings, which is generally called communication. It's amazing to have so many other users privileged with rights of administrators who still do not have anything to say, nor to explain.--Moldopodo 16:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Moldovan-Ukrainian relations
I think I see what happened here. You started an article at Moldavian-Ukrainian relations, which Flueras redirected to an identical article at Moldovan-Ukrainian relations, claiming that Moldovan is the correct term. I don't know which is which, so I can't speak to the name issue - but would that article (which looks substantially like the version you had before it was redirected, thus), work for your planned expansion? UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 18:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- It looks like Flueras was blocked as a sock of Bonaparte. FYI. UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 19:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for Personal attacks and disruptive comments. Per Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Digwuren#General_restriction. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Moldopodo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
and the diff with due explanation are.... absent?
Decline reason:
Not a request, and there is a link. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 22:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
See Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#User:Moldopodo.2C_again ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)