This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NancyHeise (talk | contribs) at 03:11, 16 June 2008 (→responding to Raul's request: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:11, 16 June 2008 by NancyHeise (talk | contribs) (→responding to Raul's request: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)|
|
Archive
Xandar, I hope you don't mind that I created an archive for you and archived your long talk page that is almost two years old! Revert me if you prefer all that discussion. NancyHeise (talk) 07:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Award for being a friend
Xandar, thanks for sticking up for me and helping me through the wild RCC FAC. You did a great job trying to keep opposers focused on FAC criteria - something that we should not have had to remind them of if they really were worthwhile FAC reviewers! I thought your arguments were perfectly sound and that you endured the worst kind of unwarranted attacks from people who should have been listening to you instead. I am sorry for the trouble you went through to stick up for me and our work. Hang in there and dont worry about Tony or Sandy. They don't like me either (but really, everyone else does :) :) :) NancyHeise (talk) 07:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
responding to Raul's request
Xandar, I think your idea fits Raul's request, please see my answer to your question on my talk page. NancyHeise (talk) 03:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)